Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bump Python to >= 3.9 #101

Closed
cbrnr opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #100
Closed

Bump Python to >= 3.9 #101

cbrnr opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #100

Comments

@cbrnr
Copy link
Contributor

cbrnr commented Apr 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

pyxdf seems to support Python >= 3.5, at least based on the badge we're showing in the README.md. I don't think that this is accurate, and in any case I propose to bump the minimum required Python version to 3.9. All versions <= 3.7 are EOL, and support for 3.8 will end soon (see here). The scientific packages ecosystem has converged on 3.9 as its current minimum Python version, so I think we should do the same. OK with everyone?

(This would allow us to e.g. get rid of the try/except hoops we're currently jumping through in #100.)
@cboulay
Copy link
Contributor

cboulay commented Apr 15, 2024

Good with me.

@cbrnr cbrnr linked a pull request Apr 16, 2024 that will close this issue
Bump to Python 3.9 #100
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Bump to Python 3.9 cbrnr/pyxdf
2 participants
@cboulay @cbrnr