Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use correct namespace for async debugging helpers. Fixes #59015 #2704

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

marek-safar
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@monojenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

Build failure

@vargaz
Copy link
Contributor

vargaz commented Sep 15, 2017

This should include the get_ObjectIdForDebugger () method as well.

@monojenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

Build failure

1 similar comment
@monojenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

Build failure

Copy link
Contributor

@spouliot spouliot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add some unit tests this time as this is a regression of https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037

@vargaz
Copy link
Contributor

vargaz commented Sep 15, 2017

Its not a regression, the problem happens on android now.

@spouliot
Copy link
Contributor

@vargaz "[iOS]error: * Assertion at /Users/builder/data/lanes/4691/6bea7a5b/source/xamarin-macios/external/mono/mono/mini/debugger-agent.c:4712, condition `array->len == 1' not met while debugging async methods" from VERIFIED/FIXED from https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037

sounds very close to "2017-08-24 17:01:29.365 sampleSIGABRT.iOS[1952:392599] error: * Assertion at /Users/builder/data/lanes/5143/80f17b0b/source/xamarin-macios/external/mono/mono/mini/debugger-agent.c:4714, condition `array->len == 1' not met" from https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59015

even if it seems (from the code) that it was never really fixed (but it did went thru all the process steps)

spouliot added a commit to spouliot/xamarin-macios that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2017
Replace xamarin#2704
It's almost identical but it adds unit tests so this does not regress.

The issue was already reported in [1] but the fix [2] was incorrect
and that was also missed when the bug was verified by QA [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
[2] xamarin#2004
[3] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037#c10
@spouliot
Copy link
Contributor

PR #2782 does the same but adds unit tests

@spouliot spouliot closed this Sep 26, 2017
spouliot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
…015 (#2782)

Replace #2704
It's almost identical but it adds unit tests so this does not regress.

The issue was already reported in [1] but the fix [2] was incorrect
and that was also missed when the bug was verified by QA [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
[2] #2004
[3] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037#c10
spouliot added a commit to spouliot/xamarin-macios that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
…015 (xamarin#2782)

Replace xamarin#2704
It's almost identical but it adds unit tests so this does not regress.

The issue was already reported in [1] but the fix [2] was incorrect
and that was also missed when the bug was verified by QA [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
[2] xamarin#2004
[3] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037#c10
spouliot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
…015 (#2782) (#2788)

Replace #2704
It's almost identical but it adds unit tests so this does not regress.

The issue was already reported in [1] but the fix [2] was incorrect
and that was also missed when the bug was verified by QA [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
[2] #2004
[3] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037#c10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants