Use consistent spelling for Nox in documentation

[cjolowicz]

Currently, docstrings, option help texts, and rst files use various spellings for Nox and the noxfile.py:

• nox
• Nox
• noxfile
• nox file
• Noxfile

We should make these usages consistent. For Nox itself, the case is already quite clear:

• Nox is spelled with a capital N, as a general rule.
• As an exception to this rule, nox is spelled in lowercase when referring to the executable. (Use sparingly.)

For the noxfile.py file, I'd propose Noxfile with capital N, just to get the bikeshed going. Any preferences/thoughts?

Update: Looking at some more of @theacodes' original commits here, I believe that "Nox" and "Noxfile" are indeed the preferred usage.

[CN-M]

Hey. I'd like to give this one a shot as my first real contribution to open source.
So if I understand the issue properly:
nox -> Nox // Unless we're talking about the executable
noxfile/nox file -> Noxfile

[DiddiLeija]

Hey @CN-M, thanks for offering!

So if I understand the issue properly:
nox -> Nox // Unless we're talking about the executable
noxfile/nox file -> Noxfile

As far as I know, this is our preferred spelling, at least with "Nox". However, I don't know about the "nox file" - "noxfile" - "Noxfile" spelling preference.

@theacodes Any thoughts about this?

[FollowTheProcess]

Update: Looking at some more of @theacodes' original commits here, I believe that "Nox" and "Noxfile" are indeed the preferred usage.

Based on the above I think "Noxfile" is fine 🙂

@CN-M if you need any help feel free to tag one of us anytime

[theacodes]

Noxfile is fine, although to be honest it's probably better if we use noxfile.py consistently instead.

[CN-M]

I'll just change the nox to Nox for now until a consensus is made about the noxfile.py

Although, the goal here is consistency in spelling and not necessarily to capitalize every instance of noxfile, so we could probably go either way as long as we keep consistent with our changes and consistent with how we refer to noxfile moving forward.
But I'm the new guy here so I'll get to work on this while I wait on you guys.

[CN-M]

Upon interacting with the code and making a few of the spelling changes, I think we should go along with what @theacodes said and use noxfile.py. So this is how I'll be implementing the changes so far and you guys will let me know if you want it done differently:

• nox to Nox.
• nox stays nox if it's an executable.
• noxfile.py stays noxfile.py.
• noxfile to Noxfile outside of the context of a file or executable.

[FollowTheProcess]

Sounds great to me 👍🏻