Skip to content

Issues: w3c/rdf-concepts

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

13 Open 27 Closed
13 Open 27 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

identity and equality of datatype values spec:editorial Minor issue or proposed change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text)
#92 opened Jun 28, 2024 by pfps
1
rdf:JSON equality of +0 and -0 spec:enhancement Issue or proposed change to enhance the spec without changing the normative content substantively
#91 opened Jun 28, 2024 by pfps
6
remove rdf:JSON if it doesn't meet the requirements of an RDF datatype spec:substantive Issue or proposed change in the spec that changes its normative content
#90 opened Jun 27, 2024 by pfps
7
underspecified lexical-to-value map for rdf:JSON spec:bug Bug in the specification
#89 opened Jun 27, 2024 by pfps
3
base JSON value objects on unordered maps spec:editorial Minor issue or proposed change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text)
#88 opened Jun 27, 2024 by pfps
2
rdf:JSON value space too liberal spec:bug Bug in the specification spec:enhancement Issue or proposed change to enhance the spec without changing the normative content substantively
#87 opened Jun 27, 2024 by pfps
5
XML schema datatypes double and float do not specify lexical-to-value map spec:bug Bug in the specification
#85 opened May 12, 2024 by pfps
3
define list of RDF serialization formats spec:editorial Minor issue or proposed change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text)
#83 opened Apr 10, 2024 by VladimirAlexiev
5
Reconsider bidirectional (bidi) tag? needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting wr:open Wide review management
#79 opened Feb 18, 2024 by termontwouter
4
Define RDF 1.2 Basic profile spec:enhancement Issue or proposed change to enhance the spec without changing the normative content substantively
#70 opened Oct 9, 2023 by gkellogg
2
Reference for punycode-encoding of IDN i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. spec:substantive Issue or proposed change in the spec that changes its normative content
#63 opened Sep 13, 2023 by domel
3
Drop the requirement to support ill-typed literals with recognized datatype IRIs needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting spec:enhancement Issue or proposed change to enhance the spec without changing the normative content substantively
#60 opened Aug 30, 2023 by wouterbeek
4
Why quoted triples, when we already have named graphs? wr:pending Wide review management
#46 opened Jun 7, 2023 by lars-hellstrom
22
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.