Where to edit 1.2 Test Cases #247
Comments
|
Something like option 2 should work. fwiw, RDF-star WG is now maintaining one test directory for each version ( 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 ) of each spec ( rdf-concepts | rdf-semantics | etc.) |
|
@TallTed , I like the notion of keeping separate test directories. But, where are the examples that you cited? I couldn't see per-version test directories in this repositories: @HolgerKnublauch , how would the tests be arranged (1) while SHACL 1.2 is in progress, and (2) once SHACL 1.2 is finished? |
|
Ok I have created a PR with a copy of the test cases from 1.0 into shacl12-test-suite. I have left out the HTML file for now but prior to publishing we could decide whether we want to upgrade the existing folder with the new tests or create a new publication. I hope the folder name and readme clarify that these tests are for 1.2 under development only. |
#247: Starting point for SHACL 1.2 test suite
The test suite produced by the old WG is here
https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/tree/gh-pages/data-shapes-test-suite/tests
Whenever we add new features or make other changes for 1.2, the PRs should include one or more test cases as those help clarify the semantics.
We need to decide where to put those new tests.
We could add them to the existing folders, with some annotation property that the tests are 1.2 specific. The problem here is that the 1.0 documents are pointing at the very same folder on GitHub, and there is a risk that ongoing work will produce temporary noise and confusion.
We could start with a clone of the old test cases into something like shacl12-tests so that they evolve independently until the 1.2 release.
How is this handled by other groups? Does anyone see problems with option 2?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: