Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New specs for review #439

Closed
3 tasks
github-actions bot opened this issue Nov 29, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
3 tasks

New specs for review #439

github-actions bot opened this issue Nov 29, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

find-specs has identified the following candidates as potential new specs to consider:

Please review if they match the inclusion criteria. Those that don't and never will should be added to ignore.json, those that don't match yet but may in the future can be added to monitor-repo.json, and those that do match should be brought as a pull request on specs.json.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 29, 2021
@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

  • clreq-gap is (I think) mislabeled as Rec-Track: Inconsistent status for clreq-gap clreq#413 ; we can either wait until a new draft is published with a fixed status, or put it in ignore list
  • geolocation is the new shortname for geolocation-API (although I'm surprised the shortname serves a WD when there is a Rec)
  • dpub-aria-1.1 should be added to the ignore list

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

webrtc-identity, payment request and credential management will disappear after the new validate-repo crawl (I've "fixed" the links in the upstream repos); I haven't looked at the situation for secure-payment-confirmation yet.

@saschanaz
Copy link
Member

saschanaz commented Dec 2, 2021

Seems like it simply has no homepage url. (Edit: now it has one)

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

overtaken by #445

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants