-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify whether "Actor Objects" properties are Functional #290
Comments
I interpret any property not explicitly labeled functional as not being functional |
We reviewed this ticket. I've updated the Primer on the W3C wiki to cover best practices for publishers and consumers to deal with array values in these properties. https://www.w3.org/wiki/ActivityPub/Primer/Cardinality_of_properties With that documentation, I think this issue is closed. |
+1, thanks for this:
Notably, AP logic and behavior depends on some of these values in nontrivial ways, eg |
@evanp Could you clarify what is meant by "these properties"? Which properties specifically? |
@melvincarvalho I expect he meant all of the Actor properties mentioned in the original issue description ^. |
The additional properties added to the ActivityStream types in the Actor Objects section does not explicitly mark any of them as functional. There is also no indication whether this is intentional.
The default guidance from the ActivityStreams properties section is:
This affects the following properties:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: