Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Namespaces are lost in the RDF model #14

Open
dbooth-boston opened this issue Dec 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Namespaces are lost in the RDF model #14

dbooth-boston opened this issue Dec 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice

Comments

@dbooth-boston
Copy link
Collaborator

As such, namespaces are often lost when tools process RDF.
One partial solution might be to standardize RDF triples that
capture serialization-related information, such as namespaces,
and have tools retain them in a separate graph. E.g. SHACL includes
RDF terms for that purpose: https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#sparql-prefixes
@dbooth-boston dbooth-boston added the Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice label Dec 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dbooth-boston