Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Velero backup is failing partially with pod volumes have no associated PVCs errors #8042

Closed
rkunalan opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@rkunalan
Copy link

What steps did you take and what happened:
We are trying to update the Velero from v1.13.2(chartVersion - v1.6.7) to v1.14.0 (chartVersion - v1.7.2) and getting some PVC related error while performing the Velero backups. This is working fine on v1.13.2. When I checked some of these pod volumes all of them are using emptyDir volume type. I have a resource filtering config map to skip this volume type. On this version it is not working as expected.

What did you expect to happen:
Velero backup should work without errors. Now it is partially failing.

The following information will help us better understand what's going on:

The debug bundle is attached for troubleshooting - bundle-2024-07-23-14-39-50.tar.gz.

Anything else you would like to add:
Our resource filtering config map is below.

version: v1
volumePolicies:
- conditions:
    nfs: {}
  action:
    type: skip
- conditions:
    volumeTypes:
      - emptyDir
  action:
    type: skip

Environment:

  • Velero version (use velero version): v1.7.2
  • Velero features (use velero client config get features): Not set
  • Kubernetes version (use kubectl version): 1.25.7
  • OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release): VMware Photon OS/Linux

Vote on this issue!

This is an invitation to the Velero community to vote on issues, you can see the project's top voted issues listed here.
Use the "reaction smiley face" up to the right of this comment to vote.

  • 👍 for "I would like to see this bug fixed as soon as possible"
  • 👎 for "There are more important bugs to focus on right now"
@blackpiglet
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate with #7929
Sorry for the inconvenience. This is fixed in the main branch and the planning v1.14.1.

@blackpiglet blackpiglet self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
@rkunalan
Copy link
Author

No worries, @blackpigle. Thanks for the fix.

@blackpiglet
Copy link
Contributor

Then close this issue for now, because it's already triaged in others.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants