diff --git a/Source/SuperLinq.Async/Amb.cs b/Source/SuperLinq.Async/Amb.cs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..793ad653
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Source/SuperLinq.Async/Amb.cs
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+using System.Runtime.ExceptionServices;
+
+namespace SuperLinq.Async;
+
+public static partial class AsyncSuperEnumerable
+{
+	/// <summary>
+	/// Propagates the async-enumerable sequence that reacts first.
+	/// </summary>
+	/// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the elements of the source sequences</typeparam>
+	/// <param name="source">The first sequence to merge together</param>
+	/// <param name="otherSources">The other sequences to merge together</param>
+	/// <returns>An async-enumerable sequence that surfaces whichever sequence returned first.</returns>
+	/// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException"><paramref name="source"/>, <paramref name="otherSources"/>, or any of
+	/// the items in <paramref name="otherSources"/> is <see langword="null"/>.</exception>
+	/// <remarks>
+	/// <para>
+	/// The implementation of this method is deeply unfair with regards to the ordering of the input sequences. The
+	/// sequences are initialized in the order in which they are received. This means that earlier sequences will have
+	/// an opportunity to finish sooner, meaning that all other things being equal, the earlier a sequence is (where
+	/// <paramref name="source"/> precedes any sequence in <paramref name="otherSources"/>), the more likely it will be
+	/// chosen by this operator. Additionally, the first sequence to return the first element of the sequence
+	/// synchronously will be chosen.
+	/// </para>
+	/// </remarks>
+	public static IAsyncEnumerable<TSource> Amb<TSource>(
+		this IAsyncEnumerable<TSource> source,
+		params IAsyncEnumerable<TSource>[] otherSources)
+	{
+		Guard.IsNotNull(source);
+		Guard.IsNotNull(otherSources);
+
+		foreach (var s in otherSources)
+			Guard.IsNotNull(s, nameof(otherSources));
+
+		return Amb(otherSources.Prepend(source));
+	}
+
+	/// <summary>
+	/// Propagates the async-enumerable sequence that reacts first.
+	/// </summary>
+	/// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the elements of the source sequences</typeparam>
+	/// <param name="sources">The sequence of sequences to merge together</param>
+	/// <returns>A sequence of every element from all source sequences, returned in an order based on how long it takes
+	/// to iterate each element.</returns>
+	/// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException"><paramref name="sources"/> or any of the items in <paramref
+	/// name="sources"/> is <see langword="null"/>.</exception>
+	/// <remarks>
+	/// <para>
+	/// The implementation of this method is deeply unfair with regards to the ordering of the <paramref
+	/// name="sources"/>. The sequences in <paramref name="sources"/> are initialized in the order in which they are
+	/// received. This means that earlier sequences will have an opportunity to finish sooner, meaning that all other
+	/// things being equal, the earlier a sequence is in <paramref name="sources"/>, the more likely it will be chosen
+	/// by this operator. Additionally, the first sequence to return the first element of the sequence synchronously
+	/// will be chosen.
+	/// </para>
+	/// </remarks>
+	public static IAsyncEnumerable<TSource> Amb<TSource>(
+		this IEnumerable<IAsyncEnumerable<TSource>> sources)
+	{
+		Guard.IsNotNull(sources);
+
+		return Core(sources);
+
+		static async IAsyncEnumerable<TSource> Core(
+			IEnumerable<IAsyncEnumerable<TSource>> sources,
+			[EnumeratorCancellation] CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
+		{
+			var cancellationSources = new List<CancellationTokenSource>();
+			var enumerators = new List<IAsyncEnumerator<TSource>>();
+			var tasks = new List<Task<bool>>();
+
+			IAsyncEnumerator<TSource>? e = default;
+			CancellationTokenSource? eCts = default;
+			try
+			{
+				foreach (var s in sources)
+				{
+#pragma warning disable CA2000 // Dispose objects before losing scope
+					// these will be disposed later
+					var cts = CancellationTokenSource.CreateLinkedTokenSource(cancellationToken);
+#pragma warning restore CA2000 // Dispose objects before losing scope
+
+					var iter = s.GetAsyncEnumerator(cts.Token);
+
+					var firstMove = iter.MoveNextAsync();
+					if (firstMove.IsCompleted)
+					{
+						// if the sequence returned the first element synchronously, then it is obviously "first", so
+						// choose it and forget the rest. we do not add this iter to the lists since those only track
+						// the items that need to be canceled and disposed.
+						e = iter;
+
+						// if the selected sequence is empty, then the amb sequence is empty as well.
+						if (!firstMove.Result)
+							yield break;
+
+						break;
+					}
+
+					// async; add it to the list
+					cancellationSources.Add(cts);
+					enumerators.Add(iter);
+					tasks.Add(firstMove.AsTask());
+				}
+
+				if (e == null)
+				{
+					// who finishes first?
+					var t = await Task.WhenAny(tasks).ConfigureAwait(false);
+					var moveNext = await t.ConfigureAwait(false);
+
+					// since we built all three lists simultaneously, we can access the same index of each. 
+					// we need the enumerator (to continue to enumerate it) and the cts (to dispose it at the end)
+					var idx = tasks.IndexOf(t);
+					e = enumerators[idx];
+					eCts = cancellationSources[idx];
+
+					// remove the selected item from the list of still-running iterators
+					cancellationSources.RemoveAt(idx);
+					enumerators.RemoveAt(idx);
+					tasks.RemoveAt(idx);
+
+					// if the selected sequence is empty, then the amb sequence is empty as well.
+					if (!moveNext)
+						yield break;
+				}
+			}
+			finally
+			{
+				// give each still-running task a chance to bail early
+				foreach (var cts in cancellationSources)
+					cts.Cancel();
+
+#pragma warning disable CA1031 // Do not catch general exception types
+				ExceptionDispatchInfo? edi = null;
+				try
+				{
+					_ = await Task.WhenAll(tasks).ConfigureAwait(false);
+				}
+				// because we canceled the cts, we might get OperationCanceledException; we don't actually care about
+				// these because we're intentionally cancelling them.
+				catch (Exception ex) when (
+					ex is OperationCanceledException
+					|| (ex is AggregateException ae && ae.InnerExceptions.All(e => e is OperationCanceledException)))
+				{ }
+				// if we're in the normal path, then e != null; in this case, we need to report any exceptions that we
+				// encounter.
+				catch (Exception ex) when (e != null)
+				{
+					edi = ExceptionDispatchInfo.Capture(ex);
+				}
+				// on the other hand, if e == null, then we silently ignore any exceptions, so that the original
+				// exception can propagate normally. this matches the behavior of await Task.WhenAll which only throws
+				// the first exception it encounters.
+				catch { }
+
+				foreach (var en in enumerators)
+				{
+					try
+					{
+						await en.DisposeAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
+					}
+					// don't worry about any exceptions while disposing - theoretically these should be fast and
+					// error-free, but just in case...
+					catch { }
+				}
+#pragma warning restore CA1031 // Do not catch general exception types
+
+				edi?.Throw();
+
+				// properly dispose of the sources
+				foreach (var cts in cancellationSources)
+					cts.Dispose();
+			}
+
+			try
+			{
+				yield return e.Current;
+				while (await e.MoveNextAsync().ConfigureAwait(false))
+					yield return e.Current;
+			}
+			finally
+			{
+				await e.DisposeAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
+				eCts?.Dispose();
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
diff --git a/Tests/SuperLinq.Async.Test/AmbTest.cs b/Tests/SuperLinq.Async.Test/AmbTest.cs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b2db10d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Tests/SuperLinq.Async.Test/AmbTest.cs
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+namespace Test.Async;
+
+public class AmbTest
+{
+	[Fact]
+	public void AmbIsLazy()
+	{
+		_ = new AsyncBreakingSequence<int>().Amb(new AsyncBreakingSequence<int>());
+		_ = AsyncSuperEnumerable.Amb(new AsyncBreakingSequence<int>(), new AsyncBreakingSequence<int>());
+	}
+
+	[Theory]
+	[InlineData(1)]
+	[InlineData(2)]
+	[InlineData(3)]
+	public async Task AmbSyncReturnsFirst(int sequenceNumber)
+	{
+		var sync = AsyncEnumerable.Range(1, 5);
+		var async = AsyncEnumerable.Range(6, 5)
+			.SelectAwaitWithCancellation(async (i, ct) =>
+			{
+				await Task.Delay(10, ct);
+				return i;
+			});
+		await using var seq1 = (sequenceNumber == 1 ? sync : async).AsTestingSequence();
+		await using var seq2 = (sequenceNumber == 2 ? sync : async).AsTestingSequence();
+		await using var seq3 = (sequenceNumber == 3 ? sync : async).AsTestingSequence();
+
+		var ts = new[] { seq1, seq2, seq3, };
+
+		var result = ts.Amb();
+
+		await result.AssertSequenceEqual(Enumerable.Range(1, 5));
+	}
+
+	[Theory]
+	[InlineData(1)]
+	[InlineData(2)]
+	[InlineData(3)]
+	public async Task AmbAsyncShortestComesFirst(int sequenceNumber)
+	{
+		var shorter = AsyncEnumerable.Range(1, 5)
+			.SelectAwaitWithCancellation(async (i, ct) =>
+			{
+				await Task.Delay(10, ct);
+				return i;
+			});
+		var longer = AsyncEnumerable.Range(6, 5)
+			.SelectAwaitWithCancellation(async (i, ct) =>
+			{
+				await Task.Delay(30, ct);
+				return i;
+			});
+		await using var seq1 = (sequenceNumber == 1 ? shorter : longer).AsTestingSequence();
+		await using var seq2 = (sequenceNumber == 2 ? shorter : longer).AsTestingSequence();
+		await using var seq3 = (sequenceNumber == 3 ? shorter : longer).AsTestingSequence();
+
+		var ts = new[] { seq1, seq2, seq3, };
+
+		var result = ts.Amb();
+
+		await result.AssertSequenceEqual(Enumerable.Range(1, 5));
+	}
+}