Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for typ in protected header #184

Closed
OR13 opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #189
Closed

Support for typ in protected header #184

OR13 opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #189
Assignees
@OR13
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ready-for-pr
Milestone
Future

Comments

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor

OR13 commented Jan 26, 2024

What is the areas you would like to add the new feature to?

Go-COSE Library

Is your feature request related to a problem?

I want to be able to use the typ header, as described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter/

What solution do you propose?

Add the code point for the typ parameter to the header parameters exposed by this library.

What alternatives have you considered?

setting the parameter directly, without using the header parameters exposed by this library.

Any additional context?

This should be done after https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter/ has been assigned an RFC number.
@OR13 OR13 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 26, 2024
@OR13 OR13 self-assigned this Jan 26, 2024
@OR13 OR13 added the blocked blocked for action: see notes which should explain the status label Jan 26, 2024
@SteveLasker
Copy link
Contributor

pending expert review of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter/

@OR13 OR13 added ready-for-pr and removed blocked blocked for action: see notes which should explain the status labels Mar 8, 2024
@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Mar 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

As discussed on the call, we will hope open PRs for this issue and the cwt claims in headers issue until RFC numbers are assigned for both.

@OR13 OR13 mentioned this issue Mar 8, 2024
Closed
@SteveLasker SteveLasker added this to the Future milestone Mar 8, 2024
@SteveLasker SteveLasker mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@OR13 OR13

Labels
enhancement New feature or request ready-for-pr
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Future
2 participants
@SteveLasker @OR13