-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for CWT Claims in Headers #173
Comments
Blocked (labeled) pending the RFC |
its still progressing, the code points have changed. its also debatable if this should be done in this repo, will there be a go-cwt ? |
@thomas-fossati @qmuntal do you think we should do all the CWT stuff in a seperate repo? if so, this issue should probably be closed. |
hi @OR13! I've just glanced through the draft and, unless I'm mistaken, there is no special processing that needs to happen at the COSE layer. So, apart from adding the registered "CWT Claims" code-point into the consts list in
We can keep this open until the IANA registration has completed, at which point we add the const and close it. |
@OR13 agreed to initiate a PR for review. |
PR is up here: #183 |
What is the areas you would like to add the new feature to?
Go-COSE Library
Is your feature request related to a problem?
See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers/
What solution do you propose?
See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers/
What alternatives have you considered?
None.
Any additional context?
Once this document becomes an RFC it is advisable to add support for it to protected headers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: