You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been using Lisa to solve an LTLf synthesis problem and I've encountered some unexpected results that I hope you could help clarify. Below are the details.
Formula:
X (G ( (X[!] ((p3) || (p0)))))
Variables:
.inputs: p0
.outputs: p3
Command:
./lisa -syn -ltlf ./testFormula -part ./testVar
Given that the top-level operator in the formula is X (weak next), I think that any trace of length 1 should satisfy it, implying that it should be realizable. However, the output I received was unexpected:
Starting the decomposition phase
Breaking formula into small pieces...
Starting the composition phase
Finished constructing minimal dfa in 11.236ms ...
Number of states (or nodes) is: 2
Final result (or number of nodes): 2
Computing the transition relation...
Finished computing the transition relation...
Starting to synthesize
System will play first
The number of nodes in T(0) is 0
The number of nodes in W(0) is 0
The number of nodes in pre_image(0) is 0
Finished synthesis after 1 iterations
The number of nodes in T(i+1) is 0
UNREALIZABLE
Finished synthesizing
0.085 ms
Total CPU time used: 0.085 ms
Total wall clock time passed: 0.223291 ms
Could you please help me understand if this is a potential bug or if I might be misunderstanding something about how to properly use the tool?
Thank you for your time and assistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I've been using Lisa to solve an LTLf synthesis problem and I've encountered some unexpected results that I hope you could help clarify. Below are the details.
Formula:
Variables:
Command:
Given that the top-level operator in the formula is X (weak next), I think that any trace of length 1 should satisfy it, implying that it should be realizable. However, the output I received was unexpected:
Could you please help me understand if this is a potential bug or if I might be misunderstanding something about how to properly use the tool?
Thank you for your time and assistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: