Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

consider moving refreshInterval and persistenceKey to JobsConfiguration #26

Closed
tanner0101 opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #30
Closed

consider moving refreshInterval and persistenceKey to JobsConfiguration #26

tanner0101 opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #30
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tanner0101
Copy link
Member

It's a bit strange to configure Jobs via the provider init and a struct named JobsConfiguration. Could we combine these?
@tanner0101 tanner0101 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 21, 2019
@tanner0101 tanner0101 mentioned this issue Jun 21, 2019
Merged
@tanner0101
Copy link
Member Author

We should also make the name of the jobs command ("jobs" by default) configurable

@tanner0101 tanner0101 mentioned this issue Jun 21, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

add new JobsWorker class vapor/queues
1 participant
@tanner0101