Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

Proposal: Recommendations on Priority #771

Open
0x4007 opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Proposal: Recommendations on Priority #771

0x4007 opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@0x4007
Copy link
Member

0x4007 commented Sep 14, 2023

I find myself bumping up priority levels on tasks when I see other tasks dependent on a previous task. The idea is that if a bounty is higher on any task, there will be more talent willing to compete over it to finish it faster.

Perhaps every time a task is mentioned, the bot can comment that it recommends bumping up the priority level?

This seems like a naive, inelegant, and noisy approach from a notifications standpoint, so I'm hoping we can improve this idea in the conversation below.

Context #710

@0x4007
Copy link
Member Author

0x4007 commented Sep 21, 2023

CVE score inspired approach: https://chat.openai.com/share/b1ed22ba-9504-4d2c-9c43-125e01f7358a

When a new issue is filed we can have ubiquibot calculate these based on the issue description and comment an estimated priority level and time estimate. Those both can be toggled in the config since they require calls to OpenAI, and because it can be perceived as noisy if the bot always comments after an issue is posted.

Perhaps another config could be that the bot can automatically set those labels which means that estimated pricing could be immediately visible if a public contributor files an issue.

Due to our security feature of only allowing collaborators to close an issue as complete and then generate a payment permit, this should be secure.

We can consider automatically re-running this evaluation if the issuer edits their specification.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant