-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
Evaluation results mismatch raw source file #4
Comments
I tried this a few days back. There's a mismatch in the argo IDs for sure, but running the preprocessing script myself fixed the issue. |
Thanks for point out, will fix it after cvpr deadline |
Hi, may I ask whether you have uploaded newer preprocessed data? For me, due to the memory limitation, processing locally is sticky, even on the servers... Thank you 😄 |
Are other vehicles used during training not only the predicted agent vehicle but also other vehicles? |
Yes (for loss and optimization), but only the |
Hi, thank you for your comments! I tried to preprocess data using the script they provided but still was not able to generated correct evaluation submission file. I was wondering when you preprocessed the data, did you directly run their script? |
Sorry for the late response here. I have been distracted since I left Uber. I check the code, it seems that the Therefore I update the You need to rerun the |
Thank you so much for the reply! I will do as you suggested. Hopefully it'll work :) |
It worked! I just simply pulled the repo and reran the preprocess_data.py. Thank you so much! |
Preprocessed test pickled updated. Let me know if you still have issues. |
Note that, I only update preprocessed test split. You need to reprocess val/train if you want to get correct mapping between If you have such results, you are welcome to share them here. I will update them. |
Recently I wanna visualize your prediction result but I got a little confused about the correspondence between the idx of preprocessed val data and
$ARGO_RAW_DATA/val/data/argo_id.csv
.In
ArgoTestDataset
:LaneGCN/data.py
Line 382 in 7e9b51d
I download your preprocessed val data and found the prediction paths with
argo_id
doesn't match the source file$ARGO_RAW_DATA/val/data/argo_id.csv
. My dataset source data is download from argo website(version 1.1), I want to know whether the order of preprocessed data matchesargo_id
? Or did I do something wrong?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: