first(), last(), and nth() should have na.rm argument

[hadley]

Since they're summary functions

[DavisVaughan]

Do you want it to be na.rm or na_rm? first() and friends have order_by as an argument already so we'd end up with a mix of snake and dot case.

I think I have a slight preference for na_rm to avoid the mixed case, and because we generally use _. I personally prefer this over being similar to base R usage of na.rm

[hadley]

Hmmmm, I'm not sure. In most cases I think using snake case would be the obvious choice, but na.rm is just so ubiquitous. But you're probably right that na_rm is the better choice.

[tnederlof]

Good point on the mixing of cases, I just changed all to na_rm instead in #6257

[DavisVaughan]

Randomly stumbled across a case where someone could use this https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73282239/retrieve-first-non-na-value-based-on-another-time-variable