We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
spec says that all keys have the format
{ "keytype" : KEYTYPE, "scheme" : SCHEME, "keyval" : KEYVAL }
this matches the specific key format descriptions and later the examples.
The implementation at the moment looks like this however:
{ "keyid_hash_algorithms" : [ HASH_ALGORITHM, ... ] "keytype" : KEYTYPE, "scheme" : SCHEME, "keyval" : KEYVAL }
where HASH_ALGORITHM is e.g. "sha256","sha512"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for submitting the issue, @jku! This discrepancy is being discussed in detail in theupdateframework/python-tuf#848.
Please also take a look at TAP 12 (draft), which proposes a new way of dealing with keyids.
Sorry, something went wrong.
keyid_hash_algorthims
I'm closing this issue as keyid_hash_algorithms is explicitly not part of the spec.
keyid_hash_algorithms
No branches or pull requests
spec says that all keys have the format
this matches the specific key format descriptions and later the examples.
The implementation at the moment looks like this however:
where HASH_ALGORITHM is e.g. "sha256","sha512"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: