Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x-select contextual components only #140

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 2, 2016
Merged

Conversation

Robdel12
Copy link
Collaborator

Still need to do a little bit more cleanup work.

@Robdel12 Robdel12 added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Aug 31, 2016
@@ -111,7 +98,8 @@ export default Ember.Component.extend({
* @return {Array|Object} the current selection
*/
_getValue() {
let options = this.get('options').filter(function(option) {
// TODO: childViews is a private property. Find something else.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Robdel12 Robdel12 Aug 31, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rwjblue just curious, why is childViews private?

And go back to a registration approach.
@Robdel12 Robdel12 force-pushed the contextual-components-only branch from b3cd3e7 to 889f76c Compare September 1, 2016 00:20
@Robdel12 Robdel12 force-pushed the contextual-components-only branch from 12a10bf to e7ca1ea Compare September 2, 2016 04:01
@Robdel12 Robdel12 changed the title [WIP]: x-select contextual components only x-select contextual components only Sep 2, 2016
@Robdel12 Robdel12 merged commit 9106179 into 3.0.0 Sep 2, 2016
Robdel12 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2016
* Make x-option contextual

* Stop using private property `childViews`

And go back to a registration approach.

* Add documentation for the actions.

* Update readme examples for contextual components.
@Robdel12 Robdel12 deleted the contextual-components-only branch September 4, 2016 00:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants