-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
azurerm_api_management
add sku_name
Consumption_0
#6868
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mbfrahry But |
Whist the unit test passes, I don't believe an acceptance test will. Do you mind adding an acceptance test that provisions the resource with |
azurerm/internal/services/apimanagement/validate/api_management_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see comments above
Hi @mbfrahry ,you're right. Changes have been pushed to get
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi @yupwei68
Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and left some comments inline, but we'll need to update the approach used here slightly to account for removing the blocks in a subsequent update - I've left comments inline with more details
Thanks!
azurerm/internal/services/apimanagement/api_management_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/apimanagement/api_management_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
hi @katbyte @tombuildsstuff Except the open comments, other changes have been pushed. Please continue your reviewing.
|
@tombuildsstuff corresponding changes have been made. Please continue reviewing. |
Hi @katbyte, is your finding regarding the SDK constant waiting for another integration? :) |
Hello, can somebody please provide updates for this PR? is it planned to be merged any time soon? |
The integration is blocked until #7603 is merged, which waits for the |
@sschmeck I believe the dependent change in go-autorest Azure/go-autorest#540 has been merged now, as such, could we prgoress this? I'm hitting my head against #6730 (comment) :( |
@AviateX14 What we depends on is the go-autorest from tombuildstuff' repo, which currently is blocked by go-sdk, as he says. And go-sdk is blocked by some problems released by some service teams. But now we're approaching to the release of these two. I believe I'll start on this PR soon. |
Any news here? |
azurerm_api_management
validate sku_name
azurerm_api_management
add sku_name
Consumption_0
I've merged the upstream master branch. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @yupwei68 - LGTM 👍
@yupwei68 - tests have passed so this is good to merge one the conflicts are resolved |
Thanks @katbyte . I've merged the latest change. Please continue your review. |
This has been released in version 2.42.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 2.42.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
Fix #6730