Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prefix_name should be optional #280

Closed
a-wf opened this issue Feb 3, 2021 · 8 comments · Fixed by #312
Closed

prefix_name should be optional #280

a-wf opened this issue Feb 3, 2021 · 8 comments · Fixed by #312

Comments

@a-wf
Copy link

a-wf commented Feb 3, 2021

Hi, could you please make prefix_name optional?
Because I create my RDS instance manually a long time ago, then now I am using Terraform, I try to import my RDS instance because it is for used a production environment infrastructure.

But manually, I didn't add a prefix_name on AWS and there is no possibility to modify and add one manually on the AWS platform. And the issue is after import my instance in the state and using your module, it asks me to force to replace my instance because of a new prefix_name attribute will be added.

prefix_name should be optional.

@cesarpball
Copy link

Hello,
Have you try?

use_parameter_group_name_prefix = false

@a-wf
Copy link
Author

a-wf commented Feb 4, 2021

Yes, but I am talking about the aws_db_subnet_group's prefix_name

@kashyn89
Copy link

kashyn89 commented Mar 9, 2021

Same probleme here even if i set option_group_description or similiar

@bryantbiggs
Copy link
Member

hi all, we are working on this. we have #302 and #304 completed so far and the last is the subnet group - stay tuned!

@kostiukolex
Copy link

Hello @bryantbiggs

parameter_group_name is required now and default value of parameter_group_use_name_prefix is true
At the same time local.parameter_group_name_id uses var.parameter_group_name, when db_parameter_group was created using name_prefix

I could set parameter_group_use_name_prefix to false, but i want to use name_prefix that is impossible now.

@bryantbiggs
Copy link
Member

hi @kostiukolex - please try v2.26.0 which was just released when you get a chance

@kostiukolex
Copy link

@bryantbiggs thanks a lot!

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 14, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants