You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
HI,
I can imagine, also some command line option what will do some tweaking of some default values.
I can imagine, some fallback syntax, eg.
when you will have e.g. filter: X and Y or Z, I can imagine some syntax like
filter: X[True] and Y[False] or dist <= centos-8[False], what will use this default value if variable is not defined.
filter: X:=True Y:=False dist:=centos-9 X and Y or dist <= centos-8 or this will assign some default value to variables if they are not defined, and then logic formulas will be same.
What will add very powerful tooling. and will be nice
And idea is that if the outcome is not defined (attributes / dimension is unknown (filter,context) and/or values cannot be compared (context)) then you can specify what should be the the outcome instead of CannotDecide.
Yep, would be very useful and powerful. And maybe there is also3. RFE, new cmd line option to use soem default when CannotDecide e,g, --default_logic_value=False what is able to simplify, when you just want to use one fix default value. for all expressions. Probably this one will be very easy to implement and used more ofter, that very specific defaults for each item.
But still I need this logic to have some default for each item as most powerfull solution.
HI,
I can imagine, also some command line option what will do some tweaking of some default values.
I can imagine, some fallback syntax, eg.
when you will have e.g.
filter: X and Y or Z
, I can imagine some syntax likefilter: X[True] and Y[False] or dist <= centos-8[False]
, what will use this default value if variable is not defined.filter: X:=True Y:=False dist:=centos-9 X and Y or dist <= centos-8
or this will assign some default value to variables if they are not defined, and then logic formulas will be same.What will add very powerful tooling. and will be nice
Originally posted by @jscotka in #117 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: