You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of now, we only require one proof (based on one circuit) to mark a block as "proven", maybe we can have 2 or 3 different circuits with different setups, then mark a block as "proven" only when there are 2/2 or 2/3 consistent proofs -- they all prove the block has the same block-hash.
We also need to suspend the chain if there are conflicting proofs.
As of now, we only require one proof (based on one circuit) to mark a block as "proven", maybe we can have 2 or 3 different circuits with different setups, then mark a block as "proven" only when there are 2/2 or 2/3 consistent proofs -- they all prove the block has the same block-hash.
We also need to suspend the chain if there are conflicting proofs.
See https://hackmd.io/@vbuterin/zk_slides_20221010 by Vitalik.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: