Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(repo): enable OpenAI-based review #13786

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 20, 2023
Merged

feat(repo): enable OpenAI-based review #13786

merged 2 commits into from
May 20, 2023

Conversation

dantaik
Copy link
Contributor

@dantaik dantaik commented May 20, 2023

Try to use ChatGPT to review our PRs automatically.

github-actions[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@dantaik dantaik marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2023 06:43
davidtaikocha
davidtaikocha previously approved these changes May 20, 2023
@dantaik dantaik enabled auto-merge May 20, 2023 06:55
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, this pull request looks good. Here are a few comments:

  • The code looks well formatted and easy to read.
  • The variable names are consistent and clear.
  • The commit messages are descriptive.
  • It is a good practice to use an action from a separate repository instead of copying the code into your repository.
  • Consider adding more comments to the code to explain the intent behind certain lines of code.

@dantaik dantaik added this pull request to the merge queue May 20, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit dd61f30 May 20, 2023
@dantaik dantaik deleted the open_ai_review branch May 20, 2023 08:12
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants