Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RAR vs. PAR #2

Open
michschl opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

RAR vs. PAR #2

michschl opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
@michschl

Comments

@michschl
Copy link

michschl commented Jul 1, 2024

Check wether or not RAR is needed or if the Swiss standard should only allow PAR
@michschl michschl self-assigned this Jul 1, 2024
@michschl
Copy link
Author

michschl commented Jul 1, 2024

Started on 23.06.24 with documentation research.

@michschl
Copy link
Author

michschl commented Jul 1, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • Documentation research
  • Attach relevant documents to wiki pages
  • Document decision

@mibrand
Copy link
Contributor

mibrand commented Aug 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

For the regular consent flow RAR should not be allowed. Instead it should be used only in those cases where fine-granular authorization is required, e.g. authorization of a payment or a trade.
The business API owner shall decide in which cases RAR shall or may be used.

@michschl
Copy link
Author

michschl commented Oct 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • Check options to name pushed requests to refer to in grant mgmt.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@michschl michschl

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mibrand @michschl