- Generator support: generation of controllers, mailers, and scaffolding will now produce nice Fortitude views
instead of ERb views. (You can add
-e erb
to yourrails generate
command line to switch back to ERb if desired.) Thanks to Gaelan for the suggestion! - Fixed an issue where if you tried to invoke methods on the object yielded to a
form_for
call or similar by usingsend
instead of calling it directly (e.g.,form_for(...) do |f|
, thenf.send(:text_field, ...)
instead off.text_field ...
), the method invocation would appear to be ignored. - Fixed an issue where Rails
_url
/_path
helpers didn't correctly pick up parameters set from the incoming request. (Thanks to Adam Becker for the bug report!)
- Rails 5 compatibility: Fortitude now is fully compatible with Rails 5.0.0.1.
- Significant improvements in performance to our dispatching to #t, the Rails method to produce translations of localized strings. Localized Rails applications tend to use this method a lot, so its performance can have a big impact on overall application performance.
- A much better error message if you try to declare a method
static
when it hasn't been defined yet — this can often be the result of putting thestatic
declaration above the method definition in the source file, rather than below it. (Thanks totobymao
for the bug report!) - Updated versions of Ruby and Rails that Travis CI tests against to the very latest.
- Fixed an issue where Fortitude wasn't properly respecting Rails' view paths. Fortitude templates could be found at
alternate view paths, but our trick of namespacing views under
Views::
wouldn't apply. Now, it all works perfectly. (Thanks to Karl He for the bug report and example patch!) - Fixed an issue where
#block_given?
always returnedtrue
inside a Fortitude widget's#content
method, whether a block was supplied to it or not. (Thanks to Jeff Dickey for the bug report!) - Fixed an incompatibility between Fortitude and Rails 4.2.5.1, since Rails 4.2.5.1 added a fifth parameter to
ActionView::PathResolver#find_templates
. (Thanks to Luke Francl for the bug report!) - Fixed incompatibilities with more-recently released versions of gems (
uglifier
,rake
,activesupport
) that otherwise broke compatibility with previous Ruby versions. - Fixed an issue where Fortitude’s system for figuring out what the name of a Fortitude widget would be, based on its
filename, could be confused by filenames ending in other extensions before
.rb
(for example,.html.rb
). - Eliminated a deprecation warning from Rails 5 caused by Fortitude's use of
render :text
internally. - Removed usage of
alias_method_chain
on Ruby 2.0 and later, in favor ofModule#prepend
. This removes deprecation warnings otherwise triggered by Rails 5. (UsingModule#prepend
causes problems in JRuby, soalias_method_chain
is still used on JRuby instead.) - Changed the behavior of
automatic_helper_access false
so that, in a Rails application, it still makes all the built-in Rails helpers properly accessible, but does not make user-defined helpers accessible. (If there are even certain built-in Rails helpers you don’t want people using, you can easily override them in your widget class to raise an exception.) Without this,automatic_helper_access false
became so cumbersome to use that it was nearly pointless. (Thanks to Matt Walters for the pull request!) - Fixed an issue where explicitly declaring an assignment method as a helper (e.g.,
helper :foo=
) did not work properly. - Fixed an issue where passing a block to (e.g.)
f.label
, wheref
is the object yielded to aform_for
helper, did not work properly. (Thanks to Adam Becker for the bug report and test case!) - Reduced escaping in attribute values: only
"
and&
need to be escaped, not<
,>
, or'
. (Thanks to Adam Becker for the bug report!) - Fixed an issue where, under certain extremely rare circumstances, adding a view path in the controller (using
ActionView::ViewPaths.append_view_path
and related methods) would not be able to figure out the proper class name of the widget, and would fail. (Thanks to Leaf for the bug report!) - Added the ability for the
inline_html
method on a widget class to accept aFortitude::RenderingContext
, thus allowing you to use it with code requiring access to helpers. (Thanks to Adam Becker for the bug report!)
- Fixed an issue where use of Rails'
form_for
orfields_for
from within anotherform_for
orfields_for
block would not produce the correct output. (Thanks to Leaf for the bug report!)
- Fixed a memory leak when using
render :inline
, or certain other cases triggered by a user. (Fortitude widget classes know about all their subclasses, in order to enable proper propagation of configuration changes. If you created a subclass of a Fortitude widget that was intended to be single-use or otherwise temporary, it would not get garbage-collected, since its superclass would still maintain a reference to it. Fortitude now uses the ref gem in order to make this a weak reference, hence allowing it to be garbage-collected.render :inline
creates a temporary subclass of a Fortitude widget, thus triggering exactly this issue.)
- Began writing lots of documentation for Fortitude, beginning with the reasons why you should use it.
- Fixed a single spec that caused failures under Rails 4.2.0 (which was an issue with the spec and something changed in Rails 4.2, not Fortitude).
- Fixed a bug where if you call
return
from inside a block passed to a tag method, the closing tags would not be output, resulting in invalid HTML. (Thanks to Leaf for the bug report!) - Fixed a bug where if you raised an exception from inside a block passed to a tag method, the closing tags would not be output, resulting in invalid HTML.
- Added a couple of missing
form_for
helper methods (button
,submit
) that somehow I missed. (Thanks to Leaf for the bug report!) - Fixed a bug where passing an object that was a
Hash
, or a subclass ofHash
, to a view would cause that object to become an object of classActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess
instead. (This was because we were, internally, calling#with_indifferent_access
on theHash
we had that contained all assignments to a widget, and#with_indifferent_access
is recursive.) Fortitude::Widget.widget_class_from_file
, when it cannot find a class in the given file, now returns any constants it did find matching names it thinks that file might use in the resulting exception. This can be used to, for example, determine if the file in question actually contains a module with the appropriate name, rather than a widget class.- When rendering using Tilt, Fortitude now properly supplies the file and line to the call to
eval
the source code of the widget. This, in turn, means that__FILE__
,__LINE__
, andcaller
will work properly when used at class level inside a widget rendered via Tilt. - Fixed a bug where
Fortitude::Widget.widget_class_from_file
andFortitude::Widget.widget_class_from_source
would, when scanning a file containing an ordinary class definition likemodule Foo; module Bar; class Baz < Fortitude::Widget
, instead return a classFoo::Baz
if such existed and was a descendant ofFortitude::Widget
instead of the correctFoo::Bar::Baz
. - Fixed a bug where, if
format_output
was turned on,<pre>
tags would still insert whitespace and newlines for formatting like any other tag — which is incorrect, because, only inside<pre>
tags, such whitespace is significant. Now,<pre>
tags correctly suppress all formatting within them. - Added
Fortitude::Widget#content_and_attributes_from_tag_arguments
; this takes as input any style of arguments permitted to a Fortitude tag method (e.g.,p
,p 'hello'
,p :id => :foo
,p 'hello', :id => :foo
) and always returns a two-element array — the first element is the text supplied to the method (if any), and the second is the attributes supplied to the method (if any), or an emptyHash
otherwise. This can help take a fair amount of bookkeeping burden off of helper methods you might build on top of Fortitude. - Added
Fortitude::Widget#add_css_classes
(a.k.a.#add_css_class
). This takes as its first argument one or more CSS classes to add (as aString
,Symbol
, orArray
of such), and, as its remainder, any arguments valid for a Fortitude tag method (e.g., textual content, aHash
of attributes, textual content and aHash
, or neither). It then returns a two-argument array of textual content and attributes; the attributes will have aclass
or:class
key that contains any classes specified in the original, plus the additional classes to add. In other words, you can use it as such:
def super_p(*args, &block)
p(*add_css_classes(:super, *args), &block)
end
...and now super_p
acts just like p
, except that it adds a class of super
to its output. This is an extremely
common pattern in code built on top of Fortitude, and so now it is baked into the core.
- Fixed a bug where doing something like
div nil, :class => 'foo'
would simply output<div></div>
, rather than the desired<div class="foo"></div>
. (Thanks to Leaf for the bug report!) - You can now render widgets from ERb using a
widget
method, using the exact same syntax you would for rendering them from Fortitude. In addition, this works for Erector widgets, too. - Fixed a bug where calling
Fortitude::Widget.widget_class_from_file
would fail if the class name as specified in the source text of the file started with leading colons (e.g.,class ::Views::Foo
).
Updated Fortitude's version number to 0.9.0: at this point, Fortitude should be considered fully production-ready, as it is used successfully in multiple very large systems and bug reports are increasingly rare. I don't want to release a 1.0 until there's excellent documentation, but the codebase seems to be ready.
- Added explicit support for eager-loading Fortitude widget classes under
views/
for Rails applications. This both should improve first-run performance of Fortitude-using Rails applications in production, and should avoid an occasional problem where Fortitude widget classes were not properly loaded in environments that used eager loading, rather than autoloading, for classes.
- Fixed an issue where
#capture
was not working properly if you rendered a widget usingrender :widget =>
in a controller. The fix further simplifies Fortitude's support for that feature and integrates even more correctly with Rails in that way. (Thanks to Leaf for the bug report!) - Fixed an issue where, if you overrode a "needs" method in a class, subclasses of that class would not use the overridden method, but instead access the "needs" method directly. (Thanks to Leaf for the bug report!)
- Fixed a simple mistake that meant the module Fortitude uses to declare
needs
methods was not given a name at all, and instead the module it uses to declare helpers was given two names, one of them incorrect. (Thanks to Leaf for catching this.) - When you're invoking a widget from another widget using the
#widget
method, and you pass a block, that block is evaluated in the context of the parent widget. (This has always been true.) However, this meant that something like the following was impossible, where you're effectively defining new DSL on a widget-by-widget basis:
class Views::ModalDialog < Views::Base
needs :title
def content
h3 "Modal: #{title}"
yield
button "Submit"
end
def modal_header(name)
h5 "Modal header: #{name}"
hr
end
end
class Views::MyView < Views::Base
needs :username
def content
h1 "User #{username}"
widget Views::ModalDialog, :title => "User Settings" do
modal_header "Settings for #{username}"
input :type => :text, :name => :email
...
end
end
end
The problem arises because, within the block in Views::MyView#content
, you want to be able to access methods from
two contexts: the parent widget (for #username
), and the child widget (for #modal_header
). Ruby provides no
single, simple way to do this, but, without it, it's very difficult to come up with a truly elegant DSL for cases
like this.
Fortitude now supports this via a small bit of method_missing
magic: the block passed to a widget is still
evaluated in the context of the parent, but, if a method is called that is not present, Fortitude looks for that
method in the child widget and invokes it there, if present. This allows the above situation, which is important
for writing libraries that "feel right" to a Ruby programmer. (The fact that the block is evaluated primarily in the
context of the parent widget, like all other Ruby blocks, preserves important standard Ruby semantics, and also
means that the onus is on the author of a feature like Views::ModalDialog
to present method names that are
unlikely to conflict with those in use in parent widgets — which seems correct.)
- You can now render Erector widgets from Fortitude widgets using just
widget MyErectorWidget
, and vice-versa, using either the class-and-assigns or instantiated-widget calling conventions. Note that this integration is not 100% perfect; in particular, passing a block from a Fortitude widget to an Erector widget, or vice-versa, is likely to fail or produce incorrect output due to the way Erector manipulates output buffers. However, the simple case of invoking a widget from another works fine, and can be very useful to those migrating to Fortitude. (Thanks to Adam Becker for the bug report!) - Fixed an issue where Fortitude could write the close tag of an element to the wrong output buffer if the output
buffer was changed inside the element (as can happen with, among other things, Rails'
cache
method). This could cause the output HTML to be structured improperly. (Thanks to Leaf for the bug report,tracking down the exact cause, and providing the fix!)
- Fortitude now supports passing blocks to widgets (above and beyond support for Rails' standard layouts and their
usage using
yield
). You can now do the following:
class Views::Foo < Views::Base
def content
p "something here"
widget Views::Bar, :name => 'Yoko' { text "hello" }
p "something else"
end
end
class Views::Bar < Views::Base
def content
p "more content"
yield
p "even more content"
end
end
This will do as expected and cause Views::Bar
's yield
call to call the block passed to it. Furthermore, because
it's often very useful to break a widget down into methods, and you might not want to explicitly pass the block all
over, you can call yield_from_widget
from any widget method and it will behave correctly. (This has actually
always been true in Fortitude for yielding to layouts; it just now will also yield to blocks passed into the widget
directly, too).
Fortitude first prefers a block passed in to #widget
; it then looks for a block passed to the constructor of a
widget, and, finally, it will delegate to the layout (if any) if no other block is found. If there isn't even a
layout, you will receive an error.
Unlike Erector, Fortitude passes any arguments you give yield
through to the widget, whether using yield
or
yield_from_widget
; it also passes, as the first argument, the widget instance being yielded from, too. This allows
a more elegant solution to the fact that the block is evaluated in the scope of the caller, not the wiget, and thus
may not have access to Fortitude methods (like p
, text
, and so on) if the caller is not itself a widget; you can
simply call those methods on the passed-in widget instance.
Thank you to Leaf for bringing up this issue!
-
The exact interpretation of attribute values has changed. Along with considerable discussion, it became clear that the most desirable behavior was the following: attributes with a value of
false
ornil
simply are not output at all (thus making behavior likeinput(:type => :checkbox, :checked => some_boolean_variable)
work properly); attributes with a value oftrue
are output as the key only (so the previous example becomes<input type="checkbox" checked>
ifsome_boolean_variable
istrue
) — except in XHTML document types, where that would be illegal, so they become (e.g.)<input type="checkbox" checked="checked">
; and attributes mapped to the empty string are output with a value of the empty string. Many thanks to Leaf and Adam Becker for all the discussion and validation around this! -
Multiple huge performance increases in Fortitude's class-loading time for widgets. Fortitude internally uses dynamic compilation of many methods to achieve the very highest runtime performance; however, the system that did this compilation could cause slow startup times if you had a very large number of widgets. Fortitude now lazy- compiles some methods and caches its own internal trivial template language in order to make startup much faster without slowing down critical runtime performance. Many thanks to Leaf for reporting this issue and testing a number of fixes for it as they were made!
-
Fixed a number of bugs in Fortitude's support for
render :widget => ...
, including use of helpers, coexistence with Erector, and being able to pass a widget class rather than an already-instantiated widget. Many thanks to Leaf for the detailed bug report, suggestions for fixes, and pointers to new methods that made the implementation much more robust.
- Fixed an issue where repeated reloading of a view in development mode in Rails could cause an error of the form
superclass mismatch for class MyView
. (The issue was that Fortitude was callingrequire_dependency
on the view.rb
file in the template handler, which caused it to get loaded outside of the scope where Rails is watching for loaded constants, so that it can unload them before the next request. This caused view classes to hang around forever, but not necessarily their superclasses, causing a very confusingsuperclass mismatch
error.) Many thanks again to Jacob Maine for the very detailed bug report and collaboration to fix the issue.
- Fortitude 0.0.6 introduced a regression, where referring to an autoloaded view class by partially-qualified namespace
path could cause an
Errno::ENOENT
exception indicating that a particular directory wasn't found.
- Fixed an issue where naming a widget with an
.html.rb
extension (for example) at the end would work at first, but cause really irritating errors (likeuninitialized constant Views::Foo::Bar
apparently in the very file that definesViews::Foo::Bar
correctly inapp/views/foo/bar.html.rb
) when editing code in development mode. (Thanks to Jacob Maine for the very detailed bug report!) - Fixed an issue where trying to use Fortitude as a Tilt engine, but passing
nil
for thelocals
, would cause an exception. (Thanks to Roman Heinrich for reporting the bug!) - Using Fortitude as a template engine for mailers (
ActionMailer::Base
subclasses) now works. (Believe it or not, this was almost completely an issue of forgetting to support this, rather than it being undone — the code was complete, and it was just a matter of applying it toActionMailer::Base
as well asActionController::Base
.) (Thanks to Jacob Maine for the bug report and pull request!) - The various on-the-fly modules that Fortitude creates and mixes in to widgets (and define helpers, tag methods,
and
needs
methods) now all have actual names, which makes them much easier to identify in debugging printouts. - The code in
spec/
that knew how to reliably create, maintain, shut down, and otherwise manipulate an externalrails server
process has now been pulled out into its own gem,oop_rails_server
; this is so I can also use it with a new, closely-related upcoming project, and because reuse is good. ;) - Updated the Travis configuration to the very latest Ruby and Rails versions.
- You can now load both Fortitude and Erector at the same time into a project, and it will "just work": Erector
widgets will render using Erector, and Fortitude widgets will render using Fortitude. (Fortitude takes over the
actual template engine registration for
.rb
files, and uses a trick to keep Erector from displacing it; it then looks at the widget class being rendered, and delegates all Erector rendering directly to Erector.) - When inside a widget, you can now render a sub-widget using
widget MyWidget.new(...)
— i.e., passing an actual widget instance — or usingwidget MyWidget, { :param1 => value1 }
— i.e., passing a widget class and aHash
of assignments (which can be omitted if the widget doesn't have anyneed
s). - Fixed an issue where, e.g., calling
#render_to_string
on a Fortitude widget within a Rails controller, and then also rendering a Fortitude widget as the template for that action, would cause a method to be called onnil
. - Added
Fortitude::RenderingContext#parent_widget
, which returns the parent widget of the current widget during rendering at runtime. (In other words, this is not the superclass of the current widget, but the widget that caused this widget to get rendered, using eitherFortitude::Widget#widget
orrender :partial => ...
.) This can, of course, benil
if there is no current parent widget. - Added
Fortitude::Widget.all_fortitude_superclasses
, which returns anArray
of all superclasses of a widget up to, but not including,Fortitude::Widget
itself. - Added
Fortitude::Widget.widget_class_from_file
, which accepts the path to a file and an array of "root" directories to look under (i.e., assuming you're using something like Rails' autoloading mechanism), and returns theClass
object for the widget that's contained in that file. This uses a series of mechansims to try to detect the class that's present in the file: a "magic comment" that can be present in the file, an array of class names to try that you can pass in, the position of the class in the file hierarchy, and scanning the source text itself. - Added a
record_tag_emission
class-level setting that tells a widget to call#emitting_tag!
on theFortitude::RenderingContext
when emitting a tag; you can use this to build various systems that need to know where in the hierarchy of tags we are at the moment. - The object being returned from Fortitude tag methods — which, in general, you should never use — now
inherits from
Object
, notBasicObject
, so that some built-in methods like#is_a?
can be safely called on it. This is for use in some users' environments doing funny things with the Ruby runtime that end up calling methods like that on the return values of widget#content
methods, which very often just end up being the tag return value object.
-
Added support for building a JRuby-specific gem to the gemspec, so that things work smoothly for JRuby users. (Thanks, Ahto Jussila!)
-
Added preliminary support for inline widget classes: if you call
.inline_subclass
on any subclass ofFortitude::Widget
and pass a block, you'll get back a new subclass of whatever class you called it on, with acontent
method defined as per the block you passed. For example:my_widget_class = Fortitude::Widgets::Html5.inline_subclass do p "hello, world!" end my_widget_class.new.to_html # => '<p>hello, world!</p>'
-
And, similarly, if you call
.inline_html
on any subclass ofFortitude::Widget
and pass a block, you'll get back the HTML rendered by the new subclass of that class. For example:html = Fortitude::Widgets::Html5.inline_html do p "hello, world!" end html # => '<p>hello, world!</p>'
-
Note that this will not work on
Fortitude::Widget
, becauseFortitude::Widget
has nodoctype
declared, and therefore has no HTML tags available. You can either use one of the pre-made classes inFortitude::Widgets
, or, better yet, declare your own base widget class and then use.inline_subclass
and.inline_html
on that. (Using that mechanism, you can also set things likeformat_output
,start_and_end_comments
, and even things likeneeds
, mixing in or defining helper methods, and so on, and it will all work just fine.)
- Changed
Fortitude::Widget#to_html
to return the generated HTML. If you pass aFortitude::RenderingContext
into this method that has previously been used to render other HTML, you'll get all HTML (old and new) both, because we always append to a single output buffer — but that should be a corner case at most.
- Void tags (those that can't take content, ever, like
<hr>
or<br>
) are now never closed in HTML4 doctypes (i.e., just output as plain<hr>
, with no close tag), since using self-closing syntax (<hr/>
) is broken and an end tag (</hr>
) is illegal according to the W3C Validator. In XHTML doctypes, they are always closed using self-closing syntax (<hr/>
) since they have to be closed somehow and that's a good way to indicate that they are void (can't ever take content). In HTML5, they are left unclosed by default (since HTML5 knows they're void and isn't expecting an end tag for them, ever), but you can useclose_void_tags true
to add self-closing syntax for them (<br/>
) if you want, since that is now allowed in HTML5. See this article for even more discussion. - Empty tags (those that can take content, but just happen not to) are now always closed using a separate tag
(e.g.,
<p></p>
), since it is not legal or correct to use self-closing syntax (<p/>
) here in HTML doctypes (HTML4 or HTML5), and it is perfectly legal in XHTML doctypes to use a separate closing tag — and, in a way, nice, since it lets you visually differentiate between void tags and normal tags that just happen to be empty. - Very significant internal refactoring of code to make development easier, and new developers' lives easier.
- Fixed support for Tilt < 2.x; earlier Tilt versions expect to be able to instantiate a template class with an empty string and have it not raise an exception, as a way of testing whether an engine works. (Empty strings are not valid Fortitude templates, since we expect to see a class declaration in there.) Now we trap that case explicitly to do nothing, which allows Tilt 1.4.x to work.
- Very first release of Fortitude.