一部のエラーメッセージの内容が表示されない問題を改善 #1083
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@sunfish-shogi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to error handling across multiple files in the project. The primary change involves transforming how errors are processed and communicated between different components. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
sunfish-shogi
changed the title
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1083 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.57% 76.58%
=======================================
Files 121 121
Lines 15644 15650 +6
Branches 2532 2536 +4
=======================================
+ Hits 11979 11985 +6
Misses 3643 3643
Partials 22 22 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/background/window/ipc.ts (1)
942-948: LGTM! Enhanced error handling with AggregateError support.The implementation correctly handles
AggregateErrorby recursively processing each error in the aggregate. This is a good improvement that allows for better error propagation when multiple errors occur.Consider adding a separator between multiple error messages to improve readability:
if (e instanceof AggregateError) { + const separator = "\n---\n"; + let isFirst = true; for (const error of e.errors) { + if (!isFirst) { + mainWindow.webContents.send(Renderer.SEND_ERROR, separator); + } sendError(error); + isFirst = false; } return; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/background/window/ipc.ts(1 hunks)src/renderer/ipc/bridge.ts(1 hunks)src/renderer/ipc/preload.ts(1 hunks)src/renderer/ipc/setup.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/renderer/ipc/bridge.ts (1)
15-15: LGTM! Updated error callback signature.The change from
Errortostringtype aligns with the main process's error handling, where errors are converted to messages before being sent over IPC.src/renderer/ipc/setup.ts (1)
68-70: LGTM! Consistent error handling implementation.The implementation correctly uses the error store to handle the string error messages received from the main process.
src/renderer/ipc/preload.ts (1)
26-29: LGTM! Consistent preload implementation.The implementation correctly bridges the IPC error events to the renderer process, maintaining type safety with the updated string-based error handling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/renderer/store/error.ts (2)
29-34: Consider adding recursion depth protection.The recursive handling of AggregateError could potentially cause stack overflow with deeply nested errors.
Consider adding a depth limit:
- add(e: unknown): void { + add(e: unknown, depth: number = 0): void { + if (depth > 100) { // arbitrary limit, adjust as needed + this.errorCounts["Maximum error depth exceeded"] = + (this.errorCounts["Maximum error depth exceeded"] || 0) + 1; + return; + } if (e instanceof AggregateError) { for (const err of e.errors) { - this.add(err); + this.add(err, depth + 1); } return; }🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 30-34: src/renderer/store/error.ts#L30-L34
Added lines #L30 - L34 were not covered by tests
35-35: Consider extracting error message cleanup logic.The regex cleanup of error messages is hardcoded and specific. Consider making it more maintainable.
Consider extracting the cleanup logic:
+ private static readonly ERROR_PATTERNS = [ + /Error invoking remote method '[^']*': Error: /, + // Add more patterns here as needed + ]; + + private cleanErrorMessage(message: string): string { + return ErrorStore.ERROR_PATTERNS.reduce( + (msg, pattern) => msg.replace(pattern, ""), + message + ); + } + add(e: unknown): void { if (e instanceof AggregateError) { for (const err of e.errors) { this.add(err); } return; } let message = e instanceof Error ? e.message || e.name : "" + e; - message = message.replace(/Error invoking remote method '[^']*': Error: /, ""); + message = this.cleanErrorMessage(message); const count = this.errorCounts[message] || 0; this.errorCounts[message] = count + 1; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/renderer/store/error.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/renderer/store/error.ts
[warning] 30-34: src/renderer/store/error.ts#L30-L34
Added lines #L30 - L34 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/renderer/store/error.ts (1)
29-34: Add test coverage for AggregateError handling.The new AggregateError handling logic is not covered by tests. This is critical functionality that should be thoroughly tested.
Would you like me to help generate test cases? Here are the scenarios we should cover:
- Single AggregateError with multiple basic errors
- Nested AggregateErrors
- Empty AggregateError
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 30-34: src/renderer/store/error.ts#L30-L34
Added lines #L30 - L34 were not covered by tests
sunfish-shogi
force-pushed
the
update-senderror
branch
from
fcb194e to
5d4bf0f
Compare
説明 / Description
#1051
メインプロセスからレンダラープロセスへ Error を伝播する部分の実装を改善する。
チェックリスト / Checklist
npm testpassednpm run lintwas applied without warnings/docs/webappnot included (except release branch)console.lognot included (except script file)Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
AggregateError.Refactor
These changes improve error handling and communication within the application, making error tracking and debugging more consistent.