|
| 1 | +# 0015. jest 27 implementation |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Date: 2021.12.16 |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Status |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +historical |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Context |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +In 2021.Q2, the team decided to perform a more comprehensive evaluation of the Jest 27 upgrade & split the effort into |
| 12 | +multiple user stories (see [ADR-0004](./0004-jest-27-support.md)). This document explains various design decisions that |
| 13 | +were accounted for as a part of the upgrade itself. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +## Decisions Made |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +### Jest was Upgraded Internally before Exposing Functionality to End Users |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +Stencil's Jest infrastructure is configured such that the compiler uses the same base Jest configuration as consumers |
| 20 | +of Stencil's testing functionality. This coupling allows for the compiler to test the base configuration while running |
| 21 | +its own unit tests. A consequence of this design is that upgrade Jest requires either doing the upgrade in such a way |
| 22 | +that affects the core team and end users (all at once), or splitting up the work (where the internal upgrade occurs |
| 23 | +first). Due to the number of breaking changes in Jest 27, we opted for the latter in order to work more carefully and |
| 24 | +ensure we understood the infrastructure as a whole. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +The work to add Jest support internally was completed in [#3171](https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/pull/3171). |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +#### Use `jest-jasmine2` as the Test Runner |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +One of the more impactful changes that Jest 27 introduces is moving away from a Jasmine-based test runner |
| 31 | +(`jest-jasmine2`) in favor of `jest-circus`. Stencil's existing infrastructure around environment set up assumes a |
| 32 | +Jasmine-based environment. Swapping out the environment type would expand the scope of the upgrade and potentially be a |
| 33 | +further breaking change for consumers. As a result, we opted to continue to use `jest-jasmine`, with an eye to moving |
| 34 | +`jest-circus` at a later date. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +#### Backwards Compatability for Earlier Versions of Jest in Preprocessor |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +Stencil comes with a standard preprocessor for Jest that transforms non-CommonJS-based files (that are not written in |
| 39 | +JavaScript). Between Jest versions 23 (when the preprocessor was written) and version 27, the function signatures of |
| 40 | +two important functions have changed: |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +1. `process()` - performs the transformation of files when running Jest tests |
| 43 | +2. `getCacheKey()` - generates a cache key for each file transformed by `process()`, and is used to prevent unnecessary |
| 44 | +transformations of files that have not changed between runs of Jest. |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +Care was taken to allow for a high degree of backwards compatability between versions 24 (the current minimum supported |
| 47 | +version) and version 27 of Jest. This led to the creation of boilerplate type checking code. To minimize maintenance of |
| 48 | +these checks, they will be eliminated in a future major release of Stencil, when the minimum supported version of Jest |
| 49 | +is incremented to v27. |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +However, Stencil's cache naming strategy did still have to change in order to ensure a positive user experience. The |
| 52 | +result of changing the naming strategy is that existing caches on a user's machine will be stale until tests are run |
| 53 | +for the first time using the version of Stencil v2.12.0 (which includes this support). After the first run of tests, |
| 54 | +the cache should be properly populated. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +#### Temporarily Disable Certain Tests in Continuous Integration Runs |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +Stencil's end-to-end testing suite uses the version of Jest that is installed at the root of the project, as if it were |
| 59 | +the version of Jest that an end user had installed themselves. This was a problematic aspect of the migration in that |
| 60 | +the separation of work assumed that the first half wouldn't break existing tests (which it did, as support for Stencil |
| 61 | +consumers to use Jest 27 had not yet been implemented). Although this broke tests, it did not break Stencil itself. To |
| 62 | +work around this issue, the end-to-end tests were temporarily disabled, and re-enabled in the follow-up PR for adding |
| 63 | +Jest 27 support for end users |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +### User Facing Decisions Made |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +The work to add Jest support for end users was completed in [#3189](https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/pull/3189). |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +#### Legacy Jest Options |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +One of the largest indicators of users wanting to use Jest 27 came in the form of GitHub issues, Slack questions, and |
| 72 | +the like with the following error message after upgrading to Jest 27 (before support was implemented): |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +> Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: Package subpath './build/cli/args' is not defined by "exports" in ../node_modules/jext-cli/package.json |
| 75 | +
|
| 76 | +The reason for this error message is the Jest team decided to encapsulate `'./build/cli/args.js'` using the `exports` |
| 77 | +keyword in the `jest-cli` subpackage as a part of the Jest 27 release. This prevents the Node runtime from importing |
| 78 | +the file by design. This posed a problem, as said file was used to generated a series of arguments to be provided to |
| 79 | +Jest when tests were run. |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +When evaluating the behavior of how Stencil used this file with Jest versions 24 through 26, it was realized that |
| 82 | +`args.js` (that is no longer available in v27) was used to generate the same arguments under all three versions of |
| 83 | +Jest. Given that this list is small, the team has decided to extract it into the Stencil codebase rather than |
| 84 | +dynamically generate it. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +Like any other static list, there is the chance of the one added to the codebase to grow stale. To help prevent this, |
| 87 | +the team intends to remove this list when Jest 27 is the minimum version of the library supported by Stencil. |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +Alternatively, the team could have taken the route of attempting to circumvent this encapsulation (and did in fact |
| 90 | +prototype this), but ultimately decided against it for two reasons: |
| 91 | +1. The Jest team has been explicit about the contract between consumers of `jest-cli` and the package itself, and the |
| 92 | +Stencil team should honor it |
| 93 | +2. The Jest team would be fully within their right to move the `args.js` file in _any_ release of Jest moving forward, |
| 94 | +which would break Stencil testing support |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +#### `@types/jest` Continued to be Used |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +Jest is (largely) written in TypeScript. When a library migrates from JavaScript to TypeScript, that type migration can |
| 99 | +be a signal to move to the typings provided by the library instead of those provided by the Definitely Typed community. |
| 100 | +For this effort, the team has decided to continue to use `@types/jest` rather than attempt to use any typings provided |
| 101 | +by Jest itself. The reason for this decision is to align ourselves with the guidance provided by Jest on using |
| 102 | +Jest with TypeScript. As of v27.4 of Jest, the current guidance is: |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +> You may also want to install the @types/jest module for the version of Jest you're using. This will help provide full |
| 105 | +> typing when writing your tests with TypeScript. |
| 106 | +
|
| 107 | +Should this advice change the Stencil team shall revisit this decision. |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +### Future Work |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +#### "Which Versions of Jest does Stencil Support?" |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +Stencil does not make it clear in its documentation which versions of Jest are supported. The team shall take efforts |
| 114 | +to clarify the versions of Jest that are currently supported. |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +## Links |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +- [ADR-0004-jest-27-support](./0004-jest-27-support.md) |
0 commit comments