We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
While trying to retest #3228 with master ( b361462 ) I noticed that prepare-range doesn't work anymore.
I noticed it when using the remote captive-core http server.
After some binary testing, I have found that the culprit is at e7cf490
To reproduce, you can run https://github.com/stellar/kube/tree/master/local/horizon-captive-core with the following patch (although I guess it also affects local captive-core):
diff --git a/local/horizon-captive-core/kustomization.yaml b/local/horizon-captive-core/kustomization.yaml index cd2acd74..7c451c41 100644 --- a/local/horizon-captive-core/kustomization.yaml +++ b/local/horizon-captive-core/kustomization.yaml @@ -37,9 +37,11 @@ patchesJson6902: kind: Deployment name: horizon-with-remote-core # Uncomment to use a custom (myimage:mytag) horizon container image (e.g. built locally) -# images: -# - name: stellar/horizon -# newName: myimage -# newTag: mytag +images: + - name: stellar/horizon + newTag: e7cf49028 # For convenience, create all the resources in the default namespace namespace: default
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@2opremio possibly fixed in #3231.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I can confirm it's fixed
bartekn
No branches or pull requests
While trying to retest #3228 with master ( b361462 ) I noticed that prepare-range doesn't work anymore.
I noticed it when using the remote captive-core http server.
After some binary testing, I have found that the culprit is at e7cf490
To reproduce, you can run https://github.com/stellar/kube/tree/master/local/horizon-captive-core with the following patch (although I guess it also affects local captive-core):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: