-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Workaround for disabled v1 /content endpoint #975
Comments
Appreciate reporting this use case. Any thoughts on having the means for the API to use If there is something I am missing to using |
Thanks for you response! I'll try locally and see if the endpoint is working out, thanks for the hint ;) |
I just checked the |
@johannesloibl, appreciate the updates and the provided pull request. Decided to go with a variant (#981) due to some issues observed from testing (e.g. finding that specifying The change introduces a new configuration option
Made this a non-default option, since On a side note, it appears that CONFSERVER-57639 mainly talks about performance issues related to requests that do not use fields to limited content fetches (i.e. when trying to query all content on an instance; what the new |
Perfectly fine for me as long I don't have to maintain the fork anymore for my company :P |
v2.6 is now available on PyPI -- marking as closed. |
Sorry could not test the development version yet. |
Hey there,
our IT shut down the v1
/content
endpoint due to this Confluence Server bug (CONFSERVER-57639): Hitting the base Content API endpoint can cause performance problem for large instances.I have a workaround in place using
/content/scan
and brute-force searching pages. You might have a look at it and decide weather it makes sense to integrate. Maybe you also know a better way to do it?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: