Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

calacs should conform to the version flags #75

Closed
sosey opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

calacs should conform to the version flags #75

sosey opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@sosey
Copy link
Member

sosey commented Apr 11, 2017

It looks like calacs was the only one not updated to produce the version strings and version numbers with separate flags, i.e.

calxxx -r should produce the full revision string
calxxx --version should produce just the version id

WFC3:

(astroconda) bash-3.2$ calwf3.e -r
Current version: 3.4(28-Sep-2016)
(astroconda) bash-3.2$ calwf3.e --version
3.4

ACS:

(astroconda) bash-3.2$ calacs.e -r
Unrecognized option -r
(astroconda) bash-3.2$ calacs.e --version
8.3.5 (21-Oct-2016)

COS:

(astroconda) bash-3.2$ calcos --version
3.1.8
(astroconda) bash-3.2$ calcos -r
3.1.8 (2016-06-29)

STIS:

(astroconda) bash-3.2$ cs0.e -r
3.4 (13-November-2013)
(astroconda) bash-3.2$ cs0.e --version
3.4

HSTDP is using these returned values.

PR87233

@sosey sosey added the bug label Apr 11, 2017
@sosey sosey added this to the HSTDP-2017.2 milestone Apr 11, 2017
@pllim
Copy link
Contributor

pllim commented Apr 11, 2017

Huh, never got the memo.

@pllim
Copy link
Contributor

pllim commented Apr 11, 2017

Is ACS Team already aware of this, or do I need to ask them about it?

@sosey
Copy link
Member Author

sosey commented Apr 11, 2017

it might have been before you were on acs? it was years ago this was changed. acs team probably doesn't care, DP is using it to populate stuff. Just looked, it went into calwf3 may 2012

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants