From a898c804a15e9ffd5a41f4723965f72045f1ac36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jonathan R. Warden" <john.warden@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 13:35:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Minor edit to readme

---
 README.md | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 611e7b6..42bedb1 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ Computing this sum over the story's entire history on Hacker News gives the stor
 
 <img alt="sample stories rank history chart" src="static/rank-history.png" width="550"/>
 <img alt="sample expected upvotes chart" src="static/expected-upvotes.png" width="550"/>
-<br/><span style="margin-left: 60px;">History of rank, upvotes, and expected upvotes for a sample story</span><br/>
+<br/>
 
 
 ## The Upvote Rate
@@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ The factor of how many more or fewer upvotes a story receives than expected is c
 ##### Chart of Upvote Rate for a Sample Story
 
 <img alt="sample upvote rate chart" src="static/upvote-rate.png" width="550"/>
-<br/><span style="margin-left: 60px;">History of the estimated upvote rate of a sample story</span><br/>
+<br/>
+
 
 The relationship `upvotes ≈ upvoteRate * expectedUpvotes` holds even in the aggregate, independently of the ranks at which upvotes actually occurred. This can be seen by taking the sum of a story's upvotes across all time intervals: