How do you engage with the Snabb developer community? The answer depends on what you want to do:
- Use the software, ask questions, report bugs.
- Contribute fixes and improvements.
- Maintain a part of Snabb by reviewing and merging pull requests.
- Create a new application to develop together with the community.
The recommended way to download Snabb is with git
directly
from from the master
branch of the snabbco
repository. This branch
always contains the latest release.
$ git checkout https://github.com/snabbco/snabb
$ cd snabb
$ make -j
The master
branch is updated with a new release each month. You can
upgrade by pulling in the latest changes to your local copy:
$ git pull
$ make -j
This is safe to do at any time because the master
branch is only
used for publishing the latest release to users. (The active software
development is done on different branches and only merged onto
master
once it is ready for release.)
You can also switch back and forth between different versions based on their release tags:
$ git checkout v2016.01 # switch to a specific version
$ make -j
...
$ git checkout master # switch back to latest
$ make -j
The recommended way to contribute improvements to Snabb is with Github pull requests. You can do this by following the Github Using pull requests instructions. Here is a brief summary.
- "Fork" your own copy of the
snabbco/snabb
repository. - Push your proposed change to a branch on your repository.
- Open a pull request from your branch. Choose the
master
branch of thesnabbco/snabb
repository as the target branch (this should be the default choice.) - Expect that within a few days a qualified maintainer will become the Assignee of your pull request and work with you to get the change merged. The maintainer may ask you some questions and even require some changes. Once they are satisfied they will merge the change onto their own branch and apply the label
merged
on the pull request. Then your work is done and the change is in the pipeline leading to release on the master branch.
Here are some tips for making your contribution smoothly:
- Use a dedicated "topic branch" for each feature or fix.
- Use the pull request text to explain why you are proposing the change.
- If the change is a work in progress then prefix the pull request title with
[wip]
. This signals that you intened to push more commits before the change is complete. - If the change is a rough draft that you want early feedback on then prefix the pull request name with
[sketch]
. This signals that you may throw the branch away and start over on a new one.
Snabb maintainers are the people who review and merge the pull requests on Github. Each maintainer takes care of one or more specific part of Snabb. These parts are called subsystems.
Each subsystem has a dedicated branch and these branches are organized as a tree:
DIAGRAM: Branches
+--lisper
+--max next<----+--documentation<--pdf manual
|
fixes |
| |
master<--+--next<--+--kbara next<--+--nix
| +--mellanox
|
|
+--wingo next<--+--lwaftr
+--multiproc
Pull requests are merged onto the most specifically relevant branch to
begin with. Later, whole child branches are merged "upstream" onto
their parent branches. This way once a change has been merged onto any
branch in the tree it will naturally flow upstream to the master
branch for release.
For example, a change to the LaTeX template for the PDF edition of the
manual would first be reviewed and merged by the maintainer of the
pdf-manual
branch. The change would then be included in successive
merges upstream to branches documentation
, max-next
, next
, and
finally master
. Each of these steps provides the opportunity for a
maintainer to improve some aspect of the change before release.
So you are interested in becoming a Snabb maintainer. Great! The other maintainers are looking forward to working with you and will be more than happy to help you learn the ropes. You can learn everything you need to know on the job: no special qualifications are required.
The first step to becoming a maintainer is to decide which kind of
pull requests you want to be responsible for. For example you could be
responsible for changes to the Makefiles, or the Intel 10G device
driver, or the packetblaster
load generator program, or any other
part of the software that is easy to identify when assigning pull
requests. You do not have to be an expert in this area already: it is
enough that you are committed to learning about it and being
responsive to contributors.
Once you have worked out which part you want to maintain then you can
propose this to the community by sending a pull request that registers
your new branch in the file src/doc/branches.md
. This pull request
will be the vehicle for talking with the other maintainers about where
to fit your new branch into the tree.
The moment this pull request is merged onto the next
branch then you
are officially a Snabb maintainer. (Congratulations in advance!)
Now that you are a registered maintainer you will watch Github for new pull requests and mark yourself as the Assignee for changes that match your area of responsibility. You are the reviewer for these changes and you decide when to accept them from the contributor.
Here is the basic criteria for merging a pull request:
- Does the change improve Snabb? It does not have to be perfect but it should clearly have a net-positive impact.
- Will the next-hop upstream maintainer agree? If not then getting your branch merged upstream may require you to make some improvements or even revert the change.
Beyond this the most important thing is to communicate with the contributor to make sure they understand exactly what they have to do in order for their change to be merged. Contributors can easily be overwhelmed by comments on pull requests, often from many different people, so the assigned maintainer needs to explain very clearly what the requirements are for merge. (Contributors will be frustrated if they do not know what feedback they are required to act on, especially when receiving conflicting ideas from different people, so you need to decide for yourself what is required and clearly explain this.)
Once you have merged one or more changes onto your branch the next
step is to open a pull request asking the next upstream maintainer to
merge your whole branch. This way all of the changes you merged will
make their way upstream step-by-step and ultimately be released by
being merged onto the master
branch.
This is where it comes in handy that the branches are organized in the
tree structure shown above. When your subsystem branch contains
changes that are ready to merge further upstream then you would open a
pull request to the parent branch in the tree. For example, if you are
the maintainer of the pdf-manual
branch and you have changes ready
for integration then you would open a pull request to the
documentation
parent branch.
How do you decide when to open this pull request? This is a latency verses throughput trade-off that you need to agree on with the upstream maintainer. On the one hand it is important for changes to move upstream quickly when they are beneficial to users or likely to conflict with other work, on the other hand you may overwhelm the upstream maintainer if you open pull requests too often. One suggestion to use as a starting point would be to open a pull request once or twice per week whenever your branch contains new changes.
The upstream branch maintainer will be responsible for considering the broader impact of the changes on your branch. They may need to resolve conflicts with other changes that they have merged, or want to ask for input from people who will be affected by the changes, or they may want to refactor the changes together with some other related code. They will tell you if they need your help with this and if they have ideas for how you can make their merging work easier in the future.