You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wanting to move away from ECT due to a lack of updates and questionable decisions regarding defaults, however the per-file statistics of oxipng makes for quite a cluttered window and rather hard to see how much of an overall improvement it had. -q stops the flood of file paths, but doesn't display anything at all.
I thought I'd ask about a -S or --summary that would print similar to ECT, allowing for quick comparisons. Something like
Processed 107 files
Could not optimize 12 files further
Saved 192.09MB out of 774.25MB (24.81% Smaller)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @jonnyawsom3
This could be a useful feature to have. Unfortunately right now, both this and the json output proposed in #583 require a breaking change to the API before they can be implemented*. So it won't happen before v10.
*Specifically, the optimize function will need to return the input and output sizes so that main.rs can aggregate them.
I'm wanting to move away from ECT due to a lack of updates and questionable decisions regarding defaults, however the per-file statistics of oxipng makes for quite a cluttered window and rather hard to see how much of an overall improvement it had.
-q
stops the flood of file paths, but doesn't display anything at all.I thought I'd ask about a
-S
or--summary
that would print similar to ECT, allowing for quick comparisons. Something likeThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: