Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maintainer/transfer #183

Closed
RobbieTheWagner opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 16 comments
Closed

Maintainer/transfer #183

RobbieTheWagner opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 16 comments

Comments

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member

@b-ash @adamschwartz @zackbloom I wrote and maintain https://github.com/shipshapecode/ember-shepherd and it still remains the best rated addon for site tours, despite the issues piling up here, so I would hate to see it die. If HubSpot is not interested in maintaining Shepherd anymore, would you be open to transferring ownership to my company?

@FranDias
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, we're interested in that 😄

@FranDias
Copy link
Contributor

You have write perms, would it be better to add a team?

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @FranDias! Does HubSpot still use Shepherd at all or have an interest in the future direction? I just commented on the PR converting from tether to popper, which I think might be the best path forward. Did you want to keep the repo under the HubSpot org or transfer it to me?

@FranDias
Copy link
Contributor

What we internally use has differed (a react implementation) than what's here but that also hasn't seen too many changes over the past few months.

@Phoenixmatrix @also Thoughts on the give write vs transfer?

@Phoenixmatrix
Copy link

I'd probably loop in @TrevorBurnham on this one, as Im pretty sure we still rely on Shepherd internally.

@TrevorBurnham
Copy link

@Phoenixmatrix Yes, we do still use Shepherd internally, but I'd be delighted to see this project go to an active maintainer. I think transfer would be preferable, since no one at HubSpot actively works on Shepherd anymore.

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member Author

@TrevorBurnham would you guys be in favor of moving to popper as well? I think that may be the best path forward, since tether has been recommending to use popper now anyway.

@TrevorBurnham
Copy link

@rwwagner90 I'd have no objection. We still use Tether internally at HubSpot, but Popper is the better project at this point.

@FranDias
Copy link
Contributor

Github only allows for transferring org repos to a member.

I'm transferring to me then transferring to @rwwagner90. Should be done in a few minutes.

@FranDias
Copy link
Contributor

Transfer request initiated/completed.

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member Author

Awesome, thanks guys! I will proceed with the popper conversion and other updates in the coming weeks.

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member Author

@FranDias do you know what was used to generate the docs and push to gh-pages?

@FranDias
Copy link
Contributor

@geekjuice @b-ash would know what jade template library they were using to build the docs …5 years ago?

@geekjuice
Copy link
Contributor

we used an internal doc building library that is very outdated at this point. while we will happily rebuild docs when needed, i do wonder if it'll be easier to just use one of the many doc building tools out there instead now since the one we used was fairly brittle 😬

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member Author

Sure thing, we can convert to something else. If it were something open source and easy to use, I would use it, but otherwise we can work on rebuilding.

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member Author

@FranDias @geekjuice could I get permissions on npm as well and/or could you just go ahead and deprecate tether-shepherd and point to shepherd.js? I just released as shepherd.js now. https://www.npmjs.com/package/shepherd.js

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants