You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Firstly, I want to thank you for the implementation. I have a question regarding the metrics provided in Table 1. When I compared the results given in Table 1 with the results provided in the original paper (TABLE IV), I noticed that the results were not similar. I assume that you used the default settings provided in the paper, I wonder what causes this difference.
For instance, in Table 1, the results for the basketball test sequence are:
Test Sequence
ARI
AMI
H
C
V-m
ACC
basketball
72.998
58.406
52.270
66.799
58.476
97.035
In TABLE IV, the basketball sequence corresponds to the S1 set, and the results given in the paper are
Test Sequence
ARI
AMI
H
C
V-m
S1
82.99
85.12
94.23
89.97
91.94
I would be glad if you can answer my question. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @shawnh2,
Firstly, I want to thank you for the implementation. I have a question regarding the metrics provided in Table 1. When I compared the results given in Table 1 with the results provided in the original paper (TABLE IV), I noticed that the results were not similar. I assume that you used the default settings provided in the paper, I wonder what causes this difference.
For instance, in Table 1, the results for the basketball test sequence are:
In TABLE IV, the basketball sequence corresponds to the S1 set, and the results given in the paper are
I would be glad if you can answer my question. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: