build: replace pdm-backends with setuptools and setuptools-scm

[huxuan]

Prefer setuptools since it supports C extension natively. I just realize that pdm-backend supports C extension by leverage setuptools. :-(

Test workflow:

• Semantic Release: https://github.com/huxuan/ss-python/actions/runs/9205816111/job/25322316985
• Package Publish (failed for publish authentication): https://github.com/huxuan/ss-python/actions/runs/9205821904/job/25322336090
• Container Publish (one of them): https://github.com/huxuan/ss-python/actions/runs/9205821904/job/25322337453

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://ss-python--580.org.readthedocs.build/en/580/

[msclock]

Seems it is possible to use scikit-build-core as build-backend and pdm to support pybind11 build extensions.

[huxuan]

Seems it is possible to use scikit-build-core as build-backend and pdm to support pybind11 build extensions.

I have not use scikit-build-core before, so you mean we should use that instead, right?

[msclock]

use that instead

@huxuan No, I just consider ss-pybind11 could combine pdm and scikit-build-core👀.