Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BENCHMARKS] Examine the calling results more closely. #205

Open
Irallia opened this issue Apr 25, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[BENCHMARKS] Examine the calling results more closely. #205

Irallia opened this issue Apr 25, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@Irallia
Copy link
Collaborator

Irallia commented Apr 25, 2022

#201 (comment):

This is interesting! It makes sense that pacbio CCS reads are much easier to call SVs from: they have long read lengths and relatively high accuracy. However, it is a bit concerning that just illumina mate-pair reads result in such low accuracy. I'd be curious to see how this looks specifically with something like Deletions, since deletions can be detected somewhat robustly just via read-depth.
Maybe if we can find out if there is a specific variant which is bringing the whole curve down, we can better understand what the issue there is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant