Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement magic rescaling of thresholds for large filesystems #14

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jspaleta
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #1

@kmf
Copy link

kmf commented May 19, 2022

will this be merged?

@jspaleta
Copy link
Contributor Author

will this be merged?

Let me clean this up and line up specific reviewers. Hopefully next week. I generally don't want to Yolo merge my own PRs unless its a critical bug fix.

@jspaleta jspaleta self-assigned this Jun 17, 2022
@jspaleta jspaleta requested a review from echlebek June 17, 2022 18:47
@jspaleta
Copy link
Contributor Author

I already know I need to do a little more work on this before its gonna pass review. I need to add some test coverage. We'll get in probably late next week.

@jspaleta
Copy link
Contributor Author

other higher priority items came up. I'm at monitorama next week but I'll try to make sure if I have time while there to do any technical work I'll on getting this brushed up.

Here's my plan when i get the round toits to work on this.
I'm going to commit this, but I'm going to open up a new PR to add test coverage for the new functions before I tag a release with this change.

@echlebek
Copy link
Contributor

@jspaleta sounds good, but please clean up the merge artifacts in CHANGELOG.md

@jspaleta
Copy link
Contributor Author

haha... no i totally missed this is MY pr branch... no need for a new PR.. im gonna work in this one. I though this was a PR from a repo fork.

@jspaleta
Copy link
Contributor Author

@echlebek
Okay I have the test coverage sorted out.

In particular I've added test cases for the adjPercent function to make sure its doing the sane expected behavior pushing the percentage threshold limits up/down according to whether the file system is smaller/larger than the "normal" filesystem size.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement magic functionality for larger volumes
3 participants