You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why do you consider SPAdes 3.7.1 to produce the optimal results for Circlator?
We have tried it with the newest SPAdes 3.10.0 with the following warning:
WARNING: SPAdes version 3.10.0 is being used. It will work, but better results are usually obtained from Circlator using SPAdes version 3.7.1. Although 3.7.1 is not the latest version, we recommend it for Circlator.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Around version 3.9.0 (I think, but would have to check) I tried all versions from around 3.5+ on the NCTC samples from the paper. 3.7.1 gave the best results, ie most circularizations.
Why do you consider SPAdes 3.7.1 to produce the optimal results for Circlator?
We have tried it with the newest SPAdes 3.10.0 with the following warning:
WARNING: SPAdes version 3.10.0 is being used. It will work, but better results are usually obtained from Circlator using SPAdes version 3.7.1. Although 3.7.1 is not the latest version, we recommend it for Circlator.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: