Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update GitHub labels and ensure that consistent standards are documented #110

Open
jrgriffiniii opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #111
Open

Update GitHub labels and ensure that consistent standards are documented #110

jrgriffiniii opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #111
Assignees

Comments

@jrgriffiniii
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the labels between core component GitHub repositories are quite inconsistent (and some of these are unclear). These should be updated in order to facilitate with onboarding and remove any obstacles from ongoing development labor.

@jrgriffiniii jrgriffiniii self-assigned this May 11, 2022
@jrgriffiniii
Copy link
Contributor Author

A number of these labels seem to have been mistakenly migrated from the deprecation of Waffle.io: https://web.archive.org/web/20190317040044/https://waffle.io/closing-its-doors

@jrgriffiniii
Copy link
Contributor Author

Labels which are invalid or no longer appropriate (e. g. those relating to workflow status on Waffle, past sprints, or the deprecated cCLA requirements) have been removed.

@jrgriffiniii
Copy link
Contributor Author

Evaluating the current state of each core component and the associated labels, I am going to please propose that the following common labels be offered:

Label Description
a11y Compliance with accessibility (a11y) standards
bug Unexpected feature behavior or software error
ci Continuous integration
code-coverage Coverage of the code base using unit, integration, or automated acceptance test suites
documentation Documentation in the form of GitHub Markdown, GitHub Wiki, or code comments (e. g. rdoc or Yard)
duplicate
enhancement Feature improvement or a new feature
invalid
maintenance A task or action delegated to the Component Interest Group
question A discussion regarding any aspect of the code base (including documentation or continuous integration)
security An update addressing a known vulnerability in the code base (or in a dependency)
wontfix

I am still uncertain as to whether or not retaining the labels wontfix, invalid, or duplicate are entirely helpful (as, in all three cases, presumably these GitHub Issues would simply be closed). These would perhaps only be valuable in assessing the status of closed issues which may have been erroneously closed?

@jrgriffiniii
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Review Requested
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant