-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 503
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make jupyter_packaging standard; add hatchling, editables, pathspec, poetry_core, tomlkit, deprecation; update tomli, flit_core, setuptools, pip, wheel #33866
Comments
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
Commit: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:8
Deferred the actual update of |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:23
Nitpick, you did not list a license for
It is |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
|
comment:25
Thanks! |
Changed reviewer from Dima Pasechnik to Dima Pasechnik, François Bissey |
comment:26
Doctest failures, I think because of the
|
comment:27
The issue is that the dictionary |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:29
Thanks for catching this and your suggestions. I have made similar changes to the doctests. The doctests now accept both formats. I think it's not necessary to track down which of the updated packages is responsible for this change. I wouldn't want to have to tighten version bounds in |
comment:31
Looks good, thank you. |
Changed reviewer from Dima Pasechnik, François Bissey to Dima Pasechnik, François Bissey, John Palmieri |
comment:32
Thanks! |
Changed branch from u/mkoeppe/upgrade_jupyter_jsmol__make_jupyter_packaging_standard to |
Changed commit from |
comment:34
as it turns out, jupyter_jsmol installation process fetches more js stuff than there is in the tarball:
aand it hangs - even tough the network is OK :-( |
comment:35
follow-up on #34421 |
In preparation for an upgrade of
jupyter_jsmol
and jupyter component packages (#33530), we make thejupyter_packaging
package standard. As the latest version ofjupyter_packaging
now useshatchling
as its build backend, we add it and its dependencies as standard packages and upgrade related packages.There should be no user-visible change.
CC: @egourgoulhon @dimpase @jhpalmieri @kiwifb @antonio-rojas @tornaria
Component: packages: standard
Author: Matthias Koeppe
Branch:
6607401
Reviewer: Dima Pasechnik, François Bissey, John Palmieri
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33866
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: