Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Laurent series docs and doctest coverage improvements #12259

Open
roed314 opened this issue Jan 4, 2012 · 2 comments
Open

Laurent series docs and doctest coverage improvements #12259

roed314 opened this issue Jan 4, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

@roed314
Copy link
Contributor

roed314 commented Jan 4, 2012

Doctest coverage is part of metaticket #12024.

Both files laurent_series_ring and laurent_series_ring_element lack the slightest introduction, many methods are textually undefined, and where they are, they adhere to the 'Returns' convention.

Component: documentation

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12259

@roed314 roed314 added this to the sage-5.11 milestone Jan 4, 2012
@KPanComputes
Copy link

comment:1

Basically a memo for me: on sage 5.7.beta2, laurent_series_ring.py has coverage 100%.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@rwst

This comment has been minimized.

@rwst rwst added t: bug and removed t: enhancement labels Jan 6, 2015
@rwst rwst changed the title Bring Doctest coverage for laurent_series_ring.py and laurent_series_ring_element.pyx to 100% Laurent series docs and doctest coverage improvements Jan 6, 2015
@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants