Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for swagger spec #1

Open
gosuri opened this issue Dec 6, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Support for swagger spec #1

gosuri opened this issue Dec 6, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@gosuri
Copy link

gosuri commented Dec 6, 2015

Awesome Library. The part I really like is ability to choose the APIs to document (other similar ones don't really provide that flexibility)

Will be even more awesome if you could tap into the swagger eco-system (auto client generators, api explorer UIs etc).

Reference Spec - https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-spec/blob/master/versions/2.0.md

@yanpozka
Copy link

yanpozka commented Feb 3, 2016

@gosuri thanks for open this issue, you did read my mind ;)

Hi @adams-sarah thanks so much for this repo, I really like it !! I'w like add swagger support to this tool, would you accept a possible PR with swagger support ?

@s-mang
Copy link
Owner

s-mang commented Feb 3, 2016

Sure! That would be amazing!
If you could just get please send me your design proposal once you get familiar with the code, before you write any new code. That way, neither of us wastes time!

Thanks!

@shauvik
Copy link

shauvik commented Apr 29, 2016

@yanpozka Thanks for volunteering. Swagger support would be awesome!
Do you have any updates on the PR?

@yanpozka
Copy link

yanpozka commented May 5, 2016

@shauvik Yes swagger support will be great, sadly I've been busy in my work and I ended using this one: http://goswagger.io which I don't recommend it forces you to have structs for request and it's impossible use composition or golang inheritance

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants