You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
will cause _capslock_ to behave as _control_, except in the case of _control+j_, which will
emit _down_. This makes it trivial to define custom modifiers which don't interfere with
one another.
Note that bindings are not affected by the modifiers of the layer in which they
are defined. Thus *capslock+j* will produce an unmodified *down* keypress, while
*shift+control+j* will produce *shift+down* as expected.
However, I believe you meant to say:
- will cause _capslock_ to behave as _control_, except in the case of _control+j_, which will+ will cause _capslock_ to behave as _control_, except in the case of _capslock+j_, which will
emit _down_. This makes it trivial to define custom modifiers which don't interfere with
one another.
Note that bindings are not affected by the modifiers of the layer in which they
are defined. Thus *capslock+j* will produce an unmodified *down* keypress, while
- *shift+control+j* will produce *shift+down* as expected. + *control+capslock+j* will produce *control+down* as expected.
I will create a PR with these changes. Feel free to close it if you intended something else.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey, hope you are doing well
There is an example in the man page about using
:
followed by thecontrol
modifier:keyd/docs/keyd.scdoc
Lines 170 to 187 in 2338f11
However, I believe you meant to say:
I will create a PR with these changes. Feel free to close it if you intended something else.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: