Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New maintainer? #26

Open
hch12907 opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

New maintainer? #26

hch12907 opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@hch12907
Copy link

hch12907 commented Jan 4, 2025

The rust-netlink crates have seen very little maintainer activity for a while:

Perhaps it would be better if there are new maintainers (even if only part-time) to look after the crates? After all, the rust-netlink has only 1 member right now very few active members right now.

Thoughts?

@cathay4t
@JohnTitor (because you seem to have commit rights to the repo)
@little-dude

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Contributor

If you wanna take a review on your PR, I'm happy to see it (I was on vacation and had limited capacity for these days)!

Perhaps it would be better if there are new maintainers (even if only part-time) to look after the crates? After all, the rust-netlink has only 1 member right now.

Note that not all the members set visibility as public, though indeed some members are inactive currently.

@hch12907
Copy link
Author

hch12907 commented Jan 8, 2025

If you wanna take a review on your PR, I'm happy to see it (I was on vacation and had limited capacity for these days)!

Yes please!

The main problem though is not that my PR is unreviewed... rather, it's about the slow (or even lack of) maintainer activity surrounding the rust-netlink crates.

Note that not all the members set visibility as public, though indeed some members are inactive currently.

I see, I will modify the description of original issue to reflect this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants