Skip to content

Commit d237e0f

Browse files
authoredFeb 20, 2020
Rollup merge of #69185 - RalfJung:const-prop-lints, r=oli-obk
Unify and improve const-prop lints Add a single helper method for all lints emitted by const-prop, and make that lint different from the CTFE `const_err` lint. Also consistently check overflow on *arithmetic*, not on the assertion, to make behavior the same for debug and release builds. See [this summary comment](#69185 (comment)) for details and the latest status. In terms of lint formatting, I went for what seems to be the better style: have a general message above the code, and then a specific message at the span: ``` error: this arithmetic operation will overflow --> $DIR/const-err2.rs:21:18 | LL | let a_i128 = -std::i128::MIN; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ attempt to negate with overflow ``` We could also just have the specific message above and no text at the span if that is preferred. I also converted some of the existing tests to use compiletest revisions, so that the same test can check a bunch of different compile flags. Fixes #69020. Helps with #69021: debug/release are now consistent, but the assoc-const test in that issue still fails (there is a FIXME in the PR for this). The reason seems to be that const-prop notices the assoc const in `T::N << 42` and does not even bother calling `const_prop` on that operation. Has no effect on #61821; the duplication there has entirely different reasons.
2 parents b680a5e + 88d14bf commit d237e0f

File tree

71 files changed

+1613
-1109
lines changed

Some content is hidden

Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.

71 files changed

+1613
-1109
lines changed
 

‎src/librustc_lint/lib.rs

+1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ fn register_builtins(store: &mut LintStore, no_interleave_lints: bool) {
305305
store.register_renamed("unstable_name_collision", "unstable_name_collisions");
306306
store.register_renamed("unused_doc_comment", "unused_doc_comments");
307307
store.register_renamed("async_idents", "keyword_idents");
308+
store.register_renamed("exceeding_bitshifts", "arithmetic_overflow");
308309
store.register_removed("unknown_features", "replaced by an error");
309310
store.register_removed("unsigned_negation", "replaced by negate_unsigned feature gate");
310311
store.register_removed("negate_unsigned", "cast a signed value instead");

‎src/librustc_mir/transform/const_prop.rs

+86-91
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
44
use std::borrow::Cow;
55
use std::cell::Cell;
66

7-
use rustc::mir::interpret::{InterpError, InterpResult, Scalar};
7+
use rustc::lint;
8+
use rustc::mir::interpret::{InterpResult, Scalar};
89
use rustc::mir::visit::{
910
MutVisitor, MutatingUseContext, NonMutatingUseContext, PlaceContext, Visitor,
1011
};
@@ -292,7 +293,6 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> interpret::Machine<'mir, 'tcx> for ConstPropMachine {
292293
struct ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
293294
ecx: InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, ConstPropMachine>,
294295
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
295-
source: MirSource<'tcx>,
296296
can_const_prop: IndexVec<Local, ConstPropMode>,
297297
param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>,
298298
// FIXME(eddyb) avoid cloning these two fields more than once,
@@ -372,7 +372,6 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
372372
ConstPropagator {
373373
ecx,
374374
tcx,
375-
source,
376375
param_env,
377376
can_const_prop,
378377
// FIXME(eddyb) avoid cloning these two fields more than once,
@@ -501,19 +500,20 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
501500
}
502501
}
503502

504-
fn report_panic_as_lint(&self, source_info: SourceInfo, panic: AssertKind<u64>) -> Option<()> {
505-
// Somewhat convoluted way to re-use the CTFE error reporting code.
503+
fn report_assert_as_lint(
504+
&self,
505+
lint: &'static lint::Lint,
506+
source_info: SourceInfo,
507+
message: &'static str,
508+
panic: AssertKind<u64>,
509+
) -> Option<()> {
506510
let lint_root = self.lint_root(source_info)?;
507-
let error = InterpError::MachineStop(Box::new(format!("{:?}", panic)));
508-
let mut diagnostic = error_to_const_error(&self.ecx, error.into());
509-
diagnostic.span = source_info.span; // fix the span
510-
diagnostic.report_as_lint(
511-
self.tcx.at(source_info.span),
512-
"this expression will panic at runtime",
513-
lint_root,
514-
None,
515-
);
516-
None
511+
self.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(lint, lint_root, source_info.span, |lint| {
512+
let mut err = lint.build(message);
513+
err.span_label(source_info.span, format!("{:?}", panic));
514+
err.emit()
515+
});
516+
return None;
517517
}
518518

519519
fn check_unary_op(
@@ -530,7 +530,12 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
530530
// `AssertKind` only has an `OverflowNeg` variant, so make sure that is
531531
// appropriate to use.
532532
assert_eq!(op, UnOp::Neg, "Neg is the only UnOp that can overflow");
533-
self.report_panic_as_lint(source_info, AssertKind::OverflowNeg)?;
533+
self.report_assert_as_lint(
534+
lint::builtin::ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW,
535+
source_info,
536+
"this arithmetic operation will overflow",
537+
AssertKind::OverflowNeg,
538+
)?;
534539
}
535540

536541
Some(())
@@ -542,27 +547,24 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
542547
left: &Operand<'tcx>,
543548
right: &Operand<'tcx>,
544549
source_info: SourceInfo,
545-
place_layout: TyLayout<'tcx>,
546550
) -> Option<()> {
547551
let r =
548552
self.use_ecx(|this| this.ecx.read_immediate(this.ecx.eval_operand(right, None)?))?;
549553
// Check for exceeding shifts *even if* we cannot evaluate the LHS.
550554
if op == BinOp::Shr || op == BinOp::Shl {
551-
let left_bits = place_layout.size.bits();
555+
// We need the type of the LHS. We cannot use `place_layout` as that is the type
556+
// of the result, which for checked binops is not the same!
557+
let left_ty = left.ty(&self.local_decls, self.tcx);
558+
let left_size_bits = self.ecx.layout_of(left_ty).ok()?.size.bits();
552559
let right_size = r.layout.size;
553560
let r_bits = r.to_scalar().and_then(|r| r.to_bits(right_size));
554-
if r_bits.map_or(false, |b| b >= left_bits as u128) {
555-
let lint_root = self.lint_root(source_info)?;
556-
self.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
557-
::rustc::lint::builtin::EXCEEDING_BITSHIFTS,
558-
lint_root,
559-
source_info.span,
560-
|lint| {
561-
let dir = if op == BinOp::Shr { "right" } else { "left" };
562-
lint.build(&format!("attempt to shift {} with overflow", dir)).emit()
563-
},
564-
);
565-
return None;
561+
if r_bits.map_or(false, |b| b >= left_size_bits as u128) {
562+
self.report_assert_as_lint(
563+
lint::builtin::ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW,
564+
source_info,
565+
"this arithmetic operation will overflow",
566+
AssertKind::Overflow(op),
567+
)?;
566568
}
567569
}
568570

@@ -572,7 +574,12 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
572574
let (_res, overflow, _ty) = this.ecx.overflowing_binary_op(op, l, r)?;
573575
Ok(overflow)
574576
})? {
575-
self.report_panic_as_lint(source_info, AssertKind::Overflow(op))?;
577+
self.report_assert_as_lint(
578+
lint::builtin::ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW,
579+
source_info,
580+
"this arithmetic operation will overflow",
581+
AssertKind::Overflow(op),
582+
)?;
576583
}
577584

578585
Some(())
@@ -595,8 +602,6 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
595602
return None;
596603
}
597604

598-
let overflow_check = self.tcx.sess.overflow_checks();
599-
600605
// Perform any special handling for specific Rvalue types.
601606
// Generally, checks here fall into one of two categories:
602607
// 1. Additional checking to provide useful lints to the user
@@ -606,20 +611,25 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
606611
// - In this case, we'll return `None` from this function to stop evaluation.
607612
match rvalue {
608613
// Additional checking: give lints to the user if an overflow would occur.
609-
// If `overflow_check` is set, running const-prop on the `Assert` terminators
610-
// will already generate the appropriate messages.
611-
Rvalue::UnaryOp(op, arg) if !overflow_check => {
614+
// We do this here and not in the `Assert` terminator as that terminator is
615+
// only sometimes emitted (overflow checks can be disabled), but we want to always
616+
// lint.
617+
Rvalue::UnaryOp(op, arg) => {
612618
trace!("checking UnaryOp(op = {:?}, arg = {:?})", op, arg);
613619
self.check_unary_op(*op, arg, source_info)?;
614620
}
615-
616-
// Additional checking: check for overflows on integer binary operations and report
617-
// them to the user as lints.
618-
// If `overflow_check` is set, running const-prop on the `Assert` terminators
619-
// will already generate the appropriate messages.
620-
Rvalue::BinaryOp(op, left, right) if !overflow_check => {
621+
Rvalue::BinaryOp(op, left, right) => {
621622
trace!("checking BinaryOp(op = {:?}, left = {:?}, right = {:?})", op, left, right);
622-
self.check_binary_op(*op, left, right, source_info, place_layout)?;
623+
self.check_binary_op(*op, left, right, source_info)?;
624+
}
625+
Rvalue::CheckedBinaryOp(op, left, right) => {
626+
trace!(
627+
"checking CheckedBinaryOp(op = {:?}, left = {:?}, right = {:?})",
628+
op,
629+
left,
630+
right
631+
);
632+
self.check_binary_op(*op, left, right, source_info)?;
623633
}
624634

625635
// Do not try creating references (#67862)
@@ -898,54 +908,39 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> MutVisitor<'tcx> for ConstPropagator<'mir, 'tcx> {
898908
}
899909
Operand::Constant(_) => {}
900910
}
901-
let span = terminator.source_info.span;
902-
let hir_id = self
903-
.tcx
904-
.hir()
905-
.as_local_hir_id(self.source.def_id())
906-
.expect("some part of a failing const eval must be local");
907-
self.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
908-
::rustc::lint::builtin::CONST_ERR,
909-
hir_id,
910-
span,
911-
|lint| {
912-
let msg = match msg {
913-
AssertKind::Overflow(_)
914-
| AssertKind::OverflowNeg
915-
| AssertKind::DivisionByZero
916-
| AssertKind::RemainderByZero => msg.description().to_owned(),
917-
AssertKind::BoundsCheck { ref len, ref index } => {
918-
let len = self
919-
.eval_operand(len, source_info)
920-
.expect("len must be const");
921-
let len = match self.ecx.read_scalar(len) {
922-
Ok(ScalarMaybeUndef::Scalar(Scalar::Raw {
923-
data,
924-
..
925-
})) => data,
926-
other => bug!("const len not primitive: {:?}", other),
927-
};
928-
let index = self
929-
.eval_operand(index, source_info)
930-
.expect("index must be const");
931-
let index = match self.ecx.read_scalar(index) {
932-
Ok(ScalarMaybeUndef::Scalar(Scalar::Raw {
933-
data,
934-
..
935-
})) => data,
936-
other => bug!("const index not primitive: {:?}", other),
937-
};
938-
format!(
939-
"index out of bounds: \
940-
the len is {} but the index is {}",
941-
len, index,
942-
)
943-
}
944-
// Need proper const propagator for these
945-
_ => return,
946-
};
947-
lint.build(&msg).emit()
948-
},
911+
let msg = match msg {
912+
AssertKind::DivisionByZero => AssertKind::DivisionByZero,
913+
AssertKind::RemainderByZero => AssertKind::RemainderByZero,
914+
AssertKind::BoundsCheck { ref len, ref index } => {
915+
let len =
916+
self.eval_operand(len, source_info).expect("len must be const");
917+
let len = self
918+
.ecx
919+
.read_scalar(len)
920+
.unwrap()
921+
.to_machine_usize(&self.tcx)
922+
.unwrap();
923+
let index = self
924+
.eval_operand(index, source_info)
925+
.expect("index must be const");
926+
let index = self
927+
.ecx
928+
.read_scalar(index)
929+
.unwrap()
930+
.to_machine_usize(&self.tcx)
931+
.unwrap();
932+
AssertKind::BoundsCheck { len, index }
933+
}
934+
// Overflow is are already covered by checks on the binary operators.
935+
AssertKind::Overflow(_) | AssertKind::OverflowNeg => return,
936+
// Need proper const propagator for these.
937+
_ => return,
938+
};
939+
self.report_assert_as_lint(
940+
lint::builtin::UNCONDITIONAL_PANIC,
941+
source_info,
942+
"this operation will panic at runtime",
943+
msg,
949944
);
950945
} else {
951946
if self.should_const_prop(value) {

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
Please sign in to comment.