-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Auto merge of #89819 - davidtwco:issue-81024-multiple-crates-multiple…
…-dwarves, r=nagisa cg: split dwarf for crate dependencies Fixes #81024. - In #79570, `-Z split-dwarf-kind={none,single,split}` was replaced by `-C split-debuginfo={off,packed,unpacked}`. `-C split-debuginfo`'s packed and unpacked aren't exact parallels to single and split, respectively. On Unix, `-C split-debuginfo=packed` will put debuginfo in object files and package debuginfo into a DWARF package file (`.dwp`) and `-C split-debuginfo=unpacked` will put debuginfo in dwarf object files and won't package it. In the initial implementation of Split DWARF, split mode wrote sections which did not require relocation into a DWARF object (`.dwo`) file which was ignored by the linker and then packaged those DWARF objects into DWARF packages (`.dwp`). In single mode, sections which did not require relocation were written into object files but ignored by the linker and were not packaged. However, both split and single modes could be packaged or not, the primary difference in behaviour was where the debuginfo sections that did not require link-time relocation were written (in a DWARF object or the object file). In the first commit of this PR, I re-introduce a `-Z split-dwarf-kind` flag, which can be used to pick between split and single modes when `-C split-debuginfo` is used to enable Split DWARF (either packed or unpacked). - Split DWARF packaging requires all of the object files to exist, including those in dependencies. ~~Therefore, the second commit of this PR makes rustc keep all objects or dwarf objects for unpacked mode and if the crate is a dependency in packed mode (determined by heuristic: if no linking is taking place), then objects or dwarf objects are kept. Objects are kept if `-Z split-dwarf-kind` is `SplitDwarfKind::Single`, and dwarf objects if `SplitDwarfKind::Split`.~~ ~~There are other approaches that could be taken to supporting packed Split DWARF with crate dependencies but this seemed like the least complicated and was contained to only rustc. Other potential approaches are described in #81024 (comment), I'm happy to change the approach I've taken here if it isn't what we're looking for.~~ See #89819 (comment) for the current approach. - ~~There's still a dependency on `llvm-dwp` after this change, which [we probably want to move away from](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/llvm-dwp.20is.20not.20recommended) but that seems out-of-scope for this PR. Ideally, Split DWARF (in packed or unpacked modes) will be usable on nightly after this lands. If there aren't any bugs reported then it's possible we could allow Split DWARF to be used on stable after this change, it depends whether or not switching away from `llvm-dwp` later would break any guarantees, or whether we'd want to change how we handle this cross-crate case in future.~~ See #89819 (comment). r? `@nagisa` cc `@alexcrichton`
- Loading branch information
Showing
18 changed files
with
443 additions
and
162 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.