From 312b3013e291f297af0afbe4000941877b068526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Martins <ricardo@scarybox.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:02:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add long diagnostics for E0133.

---
 src/librustc/diagnostics.rs | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/librustc/diagnostics.rs b/src/librustc/diagnostics.rs
index e1eb8d7418695..3d3af6aa98e95 100644
--- a/src/librustc/diagnostics.rs
+++ b/src/librustc/diagnostics.rs
@@ -112,6 +112,21 @@ reference when using guards or refactor the entire expression, perhaps by
 putting the condition inside the body of the arm.
 "##,
 
+E0133: r##"
+Using unsafe functionality, such as dereferencing raw pointers and calling
+functions via FFI or marked as unsafe, is potentially dangerous and disallowed
+by safety checks. As such, those safety checks can be temporarily relaxed by
+wrapping the unsafe instructions inside an `unsafe` block. For instance:
+
+unsafe fn f() { return; }
+
+fn main() {
+    unsafe { f(); }
+}
+
+See also http://doc.rust-lang.org/book/unsafe-code.html
+"##,
+
 E0152: r##"
 Lang items are already implemented in the standard library. Unless you are
 writing a free-standing application (e.g. a kernel), you do not need to provide
@@ -325,7 +340,6 @@ register_diagnostics! {
     E0080, // enum variant: constant evaluation error
     E0109,
     E0110,
-    E0133,
     E0134,
     E0135,
     E0136,