Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windows rustup GNU installer defaults to MSVC #560

Closed
Marcono1234 opened this issue Aug 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Windows rustup GNU installer defaults to MSVC #560

Marcono1234 opened this issue Aug 8, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@Marcono1234
Copy link

When I download the rustup GNU installer x86_64-pc-windows-gnu from https://forge.rust-lang.org/infra/other-installation-methods.html and execute it, it defaults to x86_64-pc-windows-msvc:
Installation command line screenshot

Is that intended?


I am not familiar with Rust, so I might be misusing / misunderstanding the installer.

@pro465
Copy link
Contributor

pro465 commented Oct 19, 2021

i think this issue should be posted on rustup rather than here

@XAMPPRocky
Copy link
Member

Thank you for your issue! Yeah, I would agree, the issue is with the installer not the page.

cc @Mark-Simulacrum would you be to move this issue to rustup? (It doesn't seem like there's an existing issue) Otherwise we can close it and re-open manually.

@Marcono1234
Copy link
Author

Marcono1234 commented Oct 19, 2021

Sorry for creating this issue for the wrong project. It looks like rustup already has (at least) two issues covering this: rust-lang/rustup#1851, rust-lang/rustup#2568
The -gnu suffix only seems to represent how rustup was built but does not influence the host triple selection in any way.

So, if you don't mind I would close this issue then.


A different issue I noticed is that there is content duplication between Rust Forge's Other ways to install rustup and rustup's Other installation methods. It appears rustup's documentation is more extensive. Should I create a separate issue for reducing this duplication, and just referring to rustup's documentation?

@XAMPPRocky
Copy link
Member

Should I create a separate issue for reducing this duplication, and just referring to rustup's documentation?

cc @kinnison but in my opinion it's fine to remove the forge docs and point (or redirect) to the rustup book.

@kinnison
Copy link
Contributor

I think forwarding over to the rustup book is a good plan. Various people (mostly Eric) made a lot of effort to make it good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants